Packet radio (am about to put a packet system back on air with IP and
all)
Zero Reader wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
On 07/12/16, Tony Langdon said the following...
Packet radio (am about to put a packet system back on air with IP and
all)
Are you building something with a Raspberry Pi? I'd like to make a
packet BBS with a Pi, but I don't really have a clue where to begin.
Yep. I've got IP tunneling working, so the Pi is on 44net. Next step
is to order a TNC-Pi and setup the RF side. I'm looking at using LinBPQ for much of the packet side. I used to run G8BPQ on DOS years ago.
Zero Reader wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
I look forward to building mine. I just don't know how all the software works together. I think there is a Pi image you can download that has
most of the hard work already done and you simply do some config and
add the TNC-Pi.
Yep. I've got IP tunneling working, so the Pi is on 44net.
Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Hi Tony!
12 Jul 2016 15:47, from Tony Langdon -> Zero Reader:
Yep. I've got IP tunneling working, so the Pi is on 44net.
Is 44net Hamnet??
Can you try to ping me?
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet
inet addr:44.143.24.52
Can you try to ping me?Hmm, not able to reach you. My address is 44.136.76.1
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet
inet addr:44.143.24.52
Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Hi Tony!
13 Jul 2016 21:36, from Tony Langdon -> Richard Menedetter:
Can you try to ping me?Hmm, not able to reach you. My address is 44.136.76.1
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet
inet addr:44.143.24.52
I can reach you:
fido@odroid:~$ ping 44.136.76.1
PING 44.136.76.1 (44.136.76.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 44.136.76.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=401 ms
64 bytes from 44.136.76.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=399 ms
64 bytes from 44.136.76.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=404 ms
^C
-+- 44.136.76.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 399.805/402.026/404.547/2.015 ms
There is nothing running there, just my GW to Hamnet.
I can reach you:Cool. If you run a traceroute, it that going via hamnet?
fido@odroid:~$ ping 44.136.76.1
PING 44.136.76.1 (44.136.76.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 44.136.76.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=401 ms
Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Hi Tony!
16 Jul 2016 17:21, from Tony Langdon -> Richard Menedetter:
I can reach you:Cool. If you run a traceroute, it that going via hamnet?
fido@odroid:~$ ping 44.136.76.1
PING 44.136.76.1 (44.136.76.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 44.136.76.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=401 ms
Not much to be seen ... but it goes over Hamnet ... (10.0.0.138 is the internal
router of out club station)
traceroute to 44.136.76.1 (44.136.76.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 44.143.24.1 (44.143.24.1) 29.294 ms 29.541 ms 29.570 ms
2 10.0.0.138 (10.0.0.138) 30.736 ms 30.761 ms 31.077 ms
traceroute to 44.136.76.1 (44.136.76.1), 30 hops max, 60 byteHmm, OK. That looks weird, but I have seen it before on the open Internet.
1 44.143.24.1 (44.143.24.1) 29.294 ms 29.541 ms 29.570 ms
2 10.0.0.138 (10.0.0.138) 30.736 ms 30.761 ms 31.077 ms
Anyway, just checked, all is still good. What was your IP again?
Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
That is the internal network of the HAM club.
It supposed to look like that ;)
I can also reach internal servers in the club room with that VPN.
Anyway, just checked, all is still good. What was your IP again?
inet addr:44.143.24.52
inet addr:44.143.24.52Cool, wellk I'm not getting through to you. :(
Not even getting to the first hop. :(
This is the route that leads in your direction. :(
44.143.0.0/16 via 141.75.245.225 dev tunl0 proto 44 onlink window
I can ping that public IP but nothing on traceroute via the tunnel. :(
Richard Menedetter wrote to vk3jed <=-
Can you see my webserver??
lynx http://44.143.24.52/oe1xaw.jpg
Can you see my webserver??Fixed my end last night, and I'm now on HAMNET XMPP. Can't reach your page, looks like there's a tunnel down somewhere that's affecting EU connectivity. :(
lynx http://44.143.24.52/oe1xaw.jpg
Daryl Stout wrote to All <=-
For those who don't know me, I'm Daryl Stout, originally from
the Miami, Florida area...but have lived in Little Rock, Arkansas
since August, 1977...when my late father's job transferred him
and the family to central Arkansas.
Unfortunately, with problems with the FIDONet Tosser with
Virtual Advanced software, I am getting most of my message
networks via QWK Networking, and only the FIDONet Region 19
Sysops echo via FTN (I am available via FIDONet Netmail). So,
I appreciate Tony, VK3JED, setting this up for me.
Welcome Daryl. :)
Thanks for giving me a reason to look into QWK networking. I can now offer QWK feeds to other prospective systems. FTN will always be my preference, but QWK can be handy, as your case shows. :)
Daryl Stout wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
I agree you can do more with FTN, but it's always good to have a
backup. However, the tagline below comes to mind...
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 415 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 207:56:49 |
Calls: | 6,162 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 15,711 |
Messages: | 750,675 |