• [ANSI] message area introduction

    From warmfuzzy@700:100/0 to All on Mon Aug 21 16:14:55 2017

    ͻ
    the new world order: what is the nwo, well its a massive e
    ffort to make Uthe world global;
    this would mean a one-world government, a one-world
    economic system, and a one-world religion. national sovereignty wo
    uld be abolished and the way would be made fo
    r a one-world ruler who controls it all. the i
    dea would be that if the whole world was united there would be
    no more wars and if the economic system was a s
    ingle currency there would be a more even dist
    ribution of wealth.
    ܲܲ

    ۰߲۰
    ߲ܰ߰
    ߱ ߰۲
    ۱ ܰ ޲
    ۲߰
    ߰ ۱۱
    ޱ߱۱
    ް߰
    ް
    ް۰
    ްܰ ް
    ߲۲
    ܲ ޱ ۰
    ۰ܰ
    ܰ۰
    ܲ
    ߱ܰޱ ܱ
    ۰ ܰ߱
    ܲ߱۱
    ߲
    ߲۲ ۲ܲ
    ܲ ޲
    ۲ ݰ
    ޲
    ۲߰ ݲ
    ޲۲
    ݱ ޱ
    ܲ ޲
    ޱ ܱ
    ݰ ܲ߱
    ޱ ܱ
    ް߲
    ߲߰۰ ް
    ܰ޲߰
    ۰ ܰ
    ݲ ܰ
    ܰ۰۰
    ۲ܰ ߰
    ܲ޲߰
    ߱ ߰
    ܲ۲ ܲ
    ۲߲ ۲
    ߰ ۰
    spooknet ޲ݲ ޲
    ޲
    ܰ a PHAT
    star production ݱ ޱ

    ܲ bs۰
    ߰ ۰
    30+ echonet message areas, 7+ filebone areas, BinkP, 1Gbit/s, 700
    :100/*
    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A34 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: PHATstar RetroBOX! (700:100/0)
  • From metalhead@700:100/15 to warmfuzzy on Mon Aug 7 19:14:03 2023
    all. the idea would be that if the whole world was united there would be no more wars and if the economic system was a single currency there woul be a more even distribution of wealth.

    World government can suck it!

    Without wars, how would abusive puppet regimes squander billions in taxpayer dollars? (Well, I guess they'd think of something else.)

    The globalists only diss war when it's convenient for them to do so.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: haciend.com - cloaks and daggers (700:100/15)
  • From roman@700:100/69 to metalhead on Mon Oct 2 04:28:29 2023
    With all due respect to your opinion. Globalists are not a single group, as incompetent journalists write. There are at least four groups of globalists with diametrically opposed views and conflicting with each other.
    Most likely, the ones you are referring to are the WEF group. But they are not the strongest, although they are very noisy.38 billionaires and 8,000-12,000 sympathizers, against approximately 2,000-3,000 other billionaires and their influence groups. This is very little.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)