Ha, I was chatting with Cott Lang on Indeed. He asked me why people still had interest. I said because it's there. :) And it's Renegade.
I still can't convince him to telnet over though. :(
Ha, I was chatting with Cott Lang on Indeed. He asked me why people st had interest. I said because it's there. :) And it's Renegade. I still can't convince him to telnet over though. :(
Ha, I was chatting with Cott Lang on Indeed. He asked me why people stDude thats awesome
can't convince him to telnet over though. :(Not so cool, would be proud of whats become of it.
can't convince him to telnet over though. :(
Not so cool, would be proud of whats become of it.
Ha, I was chatting with Cott Lang on Indeed. He asked me why people st
Dude thats awesome
He said it looked cool ... was surpised anyone would want to run his old stu and that it actually still loaded. Said too many new features to run the o stuff. He has the same thoughts on JAM message bases as we do ... yuck .. t much work for no real payback. That is what he said made him start thinking of quitting ... well, that and the asshole users.
That stupid Jam format is a HUGE pain in the ass to write code for, because part of it insists that you store message kludges seperately... for no reas
I did get 90% done adding it to D'B but gave up.
I know ... I would LOVE to add it ... but I don't see the worth .... If someone wants to write it, hell yeah I'll add it. Do we need it? No. Woul it be nice? Yes. Would anyone use it? Maybe.
I know ... I would LOVE to add it ... but I don't see the worth .... If someone wants to write it, hell yeah I'll add it. Do we need it? No. it be nice? Yes. Would anyone use it? Maybe.
Jam is an absolute clusterfuck of programming. I can't even BEGIN to explain how fucked it is. Theres a reason every BBS author uses the same Pascal unit written by some masochistic weirdo years ago. Even Mystic
uses it.
The only thing that would make bbS messaging better is simple forum-style threading - and PPL don't do it b/c its not compatible, easily or in a way
We're forever going to be 330, 331, 332, 333, 334 - who cares Pascal functi devs use???
The only thing that would make bbS messaging better is simple forum-sty threading - and PPL don't do it b/c its not compatible, easily or in a
I'm savvy enough to read messages without threading, have done so since
I first signed onto a BBS. Maybe its a preference thing.
Same; just saying that theres not much to DO w/ bbSes IMO, because they're perfectly retro already. Just tighten up the code and offer sysOps tools to write add-ons thru scripts or some sort of language.
There are some softwares that do message threading, like BBBS for instance. I thought Synchronet did it also.
I'm in the same camp as some other folks here; threading doesn't seem crucial.
I've sort of reached the point in the BBS journey where I prefer keeping it retro and not trying to bash in all kinds of new age features. Old curmudgeon status unlocked...
He said it looked cool ... was surpised anyone would want to run his old st and that it actually still loaded. Said too many new features to run the stuff. He has the same thoughts on JAM message bases as we do ... yuck .. much work for no real payback. That is what he said made him start thinkin of quitting ... well, that and the asshole users.
I did get 90% done adding it to D'B but gave up.
This is a format written by that Frontdoor dick of an author and a couple o l33t teenagers. I'll never understand why its popular and why the concept o storing messages on a BBS had to be so fucking complicated with the most fucked of formats. *.MSG, HDR/DAT actually isn't bad compared to fucking
The only thing that would make bbS messaging better is simple forum-style threading - and PPL don't do it b/c its not compatible, easily or in a way that could be implemented, with FTNs/Fidonet style bbS networking. So who fucking cares which format a bbS software implements? Do whatever w0rks for your userbase and is accepted by the bbSes that *still* run your 30 year ol bbS softwarez - it doesn't matter. ;P
"lux liked your message"
:Sent on my Ipod Shuffle:
Typical newschooler, Mystic boards have that forum stuff right? I think that would be kinda tough to get working on something like Renegade.
SEEN-BY: 1/100 102 103 104 106 108 109 110 112 25/0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 SEEN-BY: 25/17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 41/0Do whatever w0rks for your userbase and is accepted by the bbSes that
Hahahah! I'd like to request Google Buzz-like +1 upvoting of messages in R kthxbye.
"lux liked your message"
:Sent on my Ipod Shuffle:
Hahahah! I'd like to request Google Buzz-like +1 upvoting of messages in R kthxbye.
I never suggested adding threading to RENEGADE ;
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 606 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 96:18:38 |
Calls: | 9,601 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 16,056 |
D/L today: |
2 files (57K bytes) |
Messages: | 1,061,156 |