1. Forum
  2. Fidonet
  3. TREK

  • Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the

    From David Johnston@1:2320/105 to All on Thu Apr 10 10:32:02 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
    From Address: David@block.net
    Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth

    On 4/9/2014 10:20 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston.

    Sure it was the issue. The original post was claiming Mulgrew was the
    stupidest woman alive because she "endorsed" geocentrism.

    Nice backpedal, Johnston. We've been over this time and again. She's LITERALLY paid to endorse Robert Sungenis' ideas.

    Actually she's paid to do voiceover work.



    --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
    # Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:2320/105.97)
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)
  • From Wiseguy@1:2320/105 to All on Thu Apr 10 17:02:48 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
    From Address: epwise@yahoo.com
    Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth

    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote in
    news:li5663$pg0$1@news.albasani.net:

    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/9/2014 6:20 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:
    Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:
    David Johnston <David@block.net> wrote:
    On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:

    Let the furious backpedalling begin!

    It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>one never claimed to hold.

    She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his >>>>>>>>>>>>>reputation was. So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I >>>>>>>>>>>>>was just paid for" is backpedalling.

    She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again, >>>>>>>>>>>>>Johnston.

    From shawn <nanoflower@gNOTmail.com>'s quote of her >>>>>>>>>>>>statement:

    proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding >>>>>>>>>>>>>science and history and, had I known of his involvement, >>>>>>>>>>>>>would most certainly have avoided this documentary. I was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I

    So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.

    yeah, that seems unlikely. I mean, it's *possible* but it >>>>>>>>>>>would take a really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to >>>>>>>>>>>hide his identity, and why?

    No, it wouldn't. All it would require is for him to deal with >>>>>>>>>>her on a corporate basis. And there's no way she would have >>>>>>>>>>known who the hell he was if his name happened to come up >>>>>>>>>>anyway.

    I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,

    But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling. You >>>>>>>>couldn't just immediately hear the name and know he was a >>>>>>>>nutbar.

    Nice backpedal, Johnston.

    From what?

    From the excuses you were making for her.

    No I haven't backpedaled from them at all. I still think she had no >>>>idea who had hired her.

    That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston.

    Sure it was the issue. The original post was claiming Mulgrew was the >>stupidest woman alive because she "endorsed" geocentrism.

    Nice backpedal, Johnston. We've been over this time and again. She's LITERALLY paid to endorse Robert Sungenis' ideas.

    Yes, over and over.

    How many times do you have to be told you're wrong?
    --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
    # Origin: TeraNews.com (1:2320/105.97)
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)