4 years of Omammy has been damaging enough . we cant afford anymore of his progress. When the goverment spends more Q-E-3 who does the messah think is going to pay for another Trillion Dollars of stimulus . the millions of unemployed workers that have been at/near historic levels for the duration
of him in the White House, you think the unemployed can pay, you think the negros and mexicans will pay -- no! it will be on the backs of white
working people just like all democrat regigmes do to buy the votes of their base. GET A CLUE . THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH ! ! ! Bonehead Omammy would have us think that 4 years of 8+% unemployment means that
things are "stable" . when that is and has been a recipe for a dismal economy. What a maroon. I just hope that people are smart enough to realize that he is asking them to waste another trillion and will adopt the concept of "Fool me once" and not be duped for another round fraudulent tactics to support his socialistic ideals Imagine . asking America to let him borrow & spend ANOTHER TRILLION dollars . after he's so clearly shown that he dont know how to spend FIVE TRILLION to any degree of fruitfulness. If he gets re-elected, it'll be as telling about how stupid American's as you have seen the evidence of his failure and incompetance to protect us (Look at the Liberian embassy killings)
Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
On 11/3/2012 9:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This does:
http://online.wsj.com/
Mr. Obama told Americans in 2009 that if he did not turn around the
economy in three years his Presidency would be "a one-term proposition."
Joe Biden said three years ago that the $830 billion economic stimulus
was working beyond his "wildest dreams" and he famously promised several months after the Obama stimulus was enacted that Americans would enjoy a "summer of recovery." That was more than three years ago.
In early 2009 soon-to-be White House economists Ms. Romer and Mr.
Bernstein promised Congress that the stimulus would hold the
unemployment rate below 7% and that by now it would be 5.6%. Instead the
rate is 8.1%. The latest Census Bureau report says there are nearly
seven million fewer full-time, year-round workers today than in 2007.
The labor participation rate is the lowest since 1981.
So it has gone with nearly every prediction the President has made about where the economy would be today. Mr. Obama promised that the deficit
would be cut in half in four years, but the fiscal 2012 deficit
(estimated to be above $1 trillion) will be twice the 2008 deficit ($458 billion).
Mr. Obama said that his health-care plan would "cut the cost of a
typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year," but premiums for employer-sponsored family coverage have gone up $2,370 since 2009,
according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
He said that the linchpin for a growing economy would be renewable
energy investment, and he promised to "create five million new jobs in
solar, wind, geothermal" energy. Mr. Obama did invest some $9 billion in green energy, but his job estimate was off by at least a factor of 10
and today many solar and wind industry firms are fighting bankruptcy.
The growth in domestic U.S. energy production that he now takes credit
for has come almost entirely from the fossil fuels his Administration
has done so much to obstruct.
Associated Press
There's nothing unusual about candidates making grandiose promises that
don't come true. And it's a White House tradition to blame one's
predecessor when things don't get better. (Usually these Presidents end
up one-termers.)
The bad faith wasn't then. It's now. Mr. Obama really believed that government spending would unleash a robust recovery in employment and housing—an "economy built to last." Now that this hasn't happened and
with the Congressional Budget Office predicting a possible recession for 2013, Team Obama claims these woeful results were the best that could
have been expected.
The problem with this line is that every President who has inherited a recession in modern times has done better. (See nearby table.) Under Mr. Obama, measured on the basis of jobs, GDP growth and incomes, this has
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
Rustypat wrote:
4 years of Omammy has been damaging enough . we cant afford anymore of his >> progress. When the goverment spends more Q-E-3 who does the messah think is >> going to pay for another Trillion Dollars of stimulus . the millions of
unemployed workers that have been at/near historic levels for the duration >> of him in the White House, you think the unemployed can pay, you think the >> negros and mexicans will pay -- no! it will be on the backs of white
working people just like all democrat regigmes do to buy the votes of their >> base. GET A CLUE . THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH ! ! ! Bonehead
Omammy would have us think that 4 years of 8+% unemployment means that
things are "stable" . when that is and has been a recipe for a dismal
economy. What a maroon. I just hope that people are smart enough to realize >> that he is asking them to waste another trillion and will adopt the concept >> of "Fool me once" and not be duped for another round fraudulent tactics to >> support his socialistic ideals Imagine . asking America to let him borrow & >> spend ANOTHER TRILLION dollars . after he's so clearly shown that he dont
know how to spend FIVE TRILLION to any degree of fruitfulness. If he gets
re-elected, it'll be as telling about how stupid American's as you have
seen the evidence of his failure and incompetance to protect us (Look at the >> Liberian embassy killings)
Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.
Mark Hill wrote:
On 11/3/2012 9:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This does:
http://online.wsj.com/
Mr. Obama told Americans in 2009 that if he did not turn around the
economy in three years his Presidency would be "a one-term proposition."
Joe Biden said three years ago that the $830 billion economic stimulus
was working beyond his "wildest dreams" and he famously promised several
months after the Obama stimulus was enacted that Americans would enjoy a
"summer of recovery." That was more than three years ago.
In early 2009 soon-to-be White House economists Ms. Romer and Mr.
Bernstein promised Congress that the stimulus would hold the
unemployment rate below 7% and that by now it would be 5.6%. Instead the
rate is 8.1%. The latest Census Bureau report says there are nearly
seven million fewer full-time, year-round workers today than in 2007.
The labor participation rate is the lowest since 1981.
So it has gone with nearly every prediction the President has made about
where the economy would be today. Mr. Obama promised that the deficit
would be cut in half in four years, but the fiscal 2012 deficit
(estimated to be above $1 trillion) will be twice the 2008 deficit ($458
billion).
Mr. Obama said that his health-care plan would "cut the cost of a
typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year," but premiums for
employer-sponsored family coverage have gone up $2,370 since 2009,
according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
He said that the linchpin for a growing economy would be renewable
energy investment, and he promised to "create five million new jobs in
solar, wind, geothermal" energy. Mr. Obama did invest some $9 billion in
green energy, but his job estimate was off by at least a factor of 10
and today many solar and wind industry firms are fighting bankruptcy.
The growth in domestic U.S. energy production that he now takes credit
for has come almost entirely from the fossil fuels his Administration
has done so much to obstruct.
Associated Press
There's nothing unusual about candidates making grandiose promises that
don't come true. And it's a White House tradition to blame one's
predecessor when things don't get better. (Usually these Presidents end
up one-termers.)
The bad faith wasn't then. It's now. Mr. Obama really believed that
government spending would unleash a robust recovery in employment and
housing—an "economy built to last." Now that this hasn't happened and
with the Congressional Budget Office predicting a possible recession for
2013, Team Obama claims these woeful results were the best that could
have been expected.
The problem with this line is that every President who has inherited a
recession in modern times has done better. (See nearby table.) Under Mr.
Obama, measured on the basis of jobs, GDP growth and incomes, this has
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
Ya don't think the party of NO had anything to do with this do ya?
JAM
On 11/3/2012 12:34 PM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
Mark Hill wrote:
On 11/3/2012 9:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This does:
http://online.wsj.com/
Mr. Obama told Americans in 2009 that if he did not turn around the
economy in three years his Presidency would be "a one-term proposition." >> Joe Biden said three years ago that the $830 billion economic stimulus
was working beyond his "wildest dreams" and he famously promised several >> months after the Obama stimulus was enacted that Americans would enjoy a >> "summer of recovery." That was more than three years ago.
In early 2009 soon-to-be White House economists Ms. Romer and Mr.
Bernstein promised Congress that the stimulus would hold the
unemployment rate below 7% and that by now it would be 5.6%. Instead the >> rate is 8.1%. The latest Census Bureau report says there are nearly
seven million fewer full-time, year-round workers today than in 2007.
The labor participation rate is the lowest since 1981.
So it has gone with nearly every prediction the President has made about >> where the economy would be today. Mr. Obama promised that the deficit
would be cut in half in four years, but the fiscal 2012 deficit
(estimated to be above $1 trillion) will be twice the 2008 deficit ($458 >> billion).
Mr. Obama said that his health-care plan would "cut the cost of a
typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year," but premiums for
employer-sponsored family coverage have gone up $2,370 since 2009,
according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
He said that the linchpin for a growing economy would be renewable
energy investment, and he promised to "create five million new jobs in
solar, wind, geothermal" energy. Mr. Obama did invest some $9 billion in >> green energy, but his job estimate was off by at least a factor of 10
and today many solar and wind industry firms are fighting bankruptcy.
The growth in domestic U.S. energy production that he now takes credit
for has come almost entirely from the fossil fuels his Administration
has done so much to obstruct.
Associated Press
There's nothing unusual about candidates making grandiose promises that
don't come true. And it's a White House tradition to blame one's
predecessor when things don't get better. (Usually these Presidents end
up one-termers.)
The bad faith wasn't then. It's now. Mr. Obama really believed that
government spending would unleash a robust recovery in employment and
housing—an "economy built to last." Now that this hasn't happened and
with the Congressional Budget Office predicting a possible recession for >> 2013, Team Obama claims these woeful results were the best that could
have been expected.
The problem with this line is that every President who has inherited a
recession in modern times has done better. (See nearby table.) Under Mr. >> Obama, measured on the basis of jobs, GDP growth and incomes, this has
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
Ya don't think the party of NO had anything to do with this do ya?
JAM
Duh, I yam Frank and I furgot that the Democraps controlled Congress
from 2006 through 2010. I guess I fergit because it is convenient to
furgit. Obama is the magic mulatto. He is going to change the weather
and stop the seas from rising. Jus' you wait an's see.
Us Greeks also knows alot about finance and economics. Duh.....
But, hey. Black guys are even smarter den Greeks.
On 11/3/2012 8:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:is
Rustypat wrote:
4 years of Omammy has been damaging enough . we cant afford anymore of his >> progress. When the goverment spends more Q-E-3 who does the messah think
theirgoing to pay for another Trillion Dollars of stimulus . the millions of
unemployed workers that have been at/near historic levels for the duration >> of him in the White House, you think the unemployed can pay, you think the >> negros and mexicans will pay -- no! it will be on the backs of white
working people just like all democrat regigmes do to buy the votes of
realizebase. GET A CLUE . THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH ! ! ! Bonehead >> Omammy would have us think that 4 years of 8+% unemployment means that
things are "stable" . when that is and has been a recipe for a dismal
economy. What a maroon. I just hope that people are smart enough to
conceptthat he is asking them to waste another trillion and will adopt the
&of "Fool me once" and not be duped for another round fraudulent tactics to >> support his socialistic ideals Imagine . asking America to let him borrow
thespend ANOTHER TRILLION dollars . after he's so clearly shown that he dont >> know how to spend FIVE TRILLION to any degree of fruitfulness. If he gets >> re-elected, it'll be as telling about how stupid American's as you have >> seen the evidence of his failure and incompetance to protect us (Look at
Liberian embassy killings)
Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.
Duh...My name is Frank the fuck up. I love Obama cuz I'm gonna get a
free cell phone, and somebody elses left over food, and a free house,
and ah...I furgit, but Obama is going to give me everthing, and I don't
have to work. Duh.....
Chummy wrote:
On 11/3/2012 8:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
Rustypat wrote:Duh...My name is Frank the fuck up. I love Obama cuz I'm gonna get a
4 years of Omammy has been damaging enough . we cant afford anymore of his >>>> progress. When the goverment spends more Q-E-3 who does the messah think is
going to pay for another Trillion Dollars of stimulus . the millions of >>>> unemployed workers that have been at/near historic levels for the duration >>>> of him in the White House, you think the unemployed can pay, you think the >>>> negros and mexicans will pay -- no! it will be on the backs of white
working people just like all democrat regigmes do to buy the votes of their
base. GET A CLUE . THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH ! ! ! Bonehead >>>> Omammy would have us think that 4 years of 8+% unemployment means that >>>> things are "stable" . when that is and has been a recipe for a dismal
economy. What a maroon. I just hope that people are smart enough to realize
that he is asking them to waste another trillion and will adopt the concept
of "Fool me once" and not be duped for another round fraudulent tactics to >>>> support his socialistic ideals Imagine . asking America to let him borrow &
spend ANOTHER TRILLION dollars . after he's so clearly shown that he dont >>>> know how to spend FIVE TRILLION to any degree of fruitfulness. If he gets >>>> re-elected, it'll be as telling about how stupid American's as you have >>>> seen the evidence of his failure and incompetance to protect us (Look at the
Liberian embassy killings)
Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.
free cell phone, and somebody elses left over food, and a free house,
and ah...I furgit, but Obama is going to give me everthing, and I don't
have to work. Duh.....
Now we know where you are coming from
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/foxreality.jpg
JAM
On 11/3/2012 9:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This does:
http://online.wsj.com/
Mr. Obama told Americans in 2009 that if he did not turn around the
economy in three years his Presidency would be "a one-term proposition."
Joe Biden said three years ago that the $830 billion economic stimulus
was working beyond his "wildest dreams" and he famously promised several months after the Obama stimulus was enacted that Americans would enjoy a "summer of recovery." That was more than three years ago.
In early 2009 soon-to-be White House economists Ms. Romer and Mr.
Bernstein promised Congress that the stimulus would hold the
unemployment rate below 7% and that by now it would be 5.6%. Instead the
rate is 8.1%. The latest Census Bureau report says there are nearly
seven million fewer full-time, year-round workers today than in 2007.
The labor participation rate is the lowest since 1981.
So it has gone with nearly every prediction the President has made about where the economy would be today. Mr. Obama promised that the deficit
would be cut in half in four years, but the fiscal 2012 deficit
(estimated to be above $1 trillion) will be twice the 2008 deficit ($458 billion).
Mr. Obama said that his health-care plan would "cut the cost of a
typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year," but premiums for employer-sponsored family coverage have gone up $2,370 since 2009,
according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
He said that the linchpin for a growing economy would be renewable
energy investment, and he promised to "create five million new jobs in
solar, wind, geothermal" energy. Mr. Obama did invest some $9 billion in green energy, but his job estimate was off by at least a factor of 10
and today many solar and wind industry firms are fighting bankruptcy.
The growth in domestic U.S. energy production that he now takes credit
for has come almost entirely from the fossil fuels his Administration
has done so much to obstruct.
Associated Press
There's nothing unusual about candidates making grandiose promises that
don't come true. And it's a White House tradition to blame one's
predecessor when things don't get better. (Usually these Presidents end
up one-termers.)
The bad faith wasn't then. It's now. Mr. Obama really believed that government spending would unleash a robust recovery in employment and housing—an "economy built to last." Now that this hasn't happened and
with the Congressional Budget Office predicting a possible recession for 2013, Team Obama claims these woeful results were the best that could
have been expected.
The problem with this line is that every President who has inherited a recession in modern times has done better. (See nearby table.) Under Mr. Obama, measured on the basis of jobs, GDP growth and incomes, this has
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
Now we know where you are coming from
"Frank Galikanokus" wrote in message news:509571C8.4D05FEAD@nospam.net...
Mark Hill wrote:
On 11/3/2012 9:12 AM, Frank Galikanokus wrote:
This kind of lunacy does not deserve a response.Obama-Nation is an Abomination.
This does:
http://online.wsj.com/
Mr. Obama told Americans in 2009 that if he did not turn around the
economy in three years his Presidency would be "a one-term proposition."
Joe Biden said three years ago that the $830 billion economic stimulus
was working beyond his "wildest dreams" and he famously promised several
months after the Obama stimulus was enacted that Americans would enjoy a
"summer of recovery." That was more than three years ago.
In early 2009 soon-to-be White House economists Ms. Romer and Mr.
Bernstein promised Congress that the stimulus would hold the
unemployment rate below 7% and that by now it would be 5.6%. Instead the
rate is 8.1%. The latest Census Bureau report says there are nearly
seven million fewer full-time, year-round workers today than in 2007.
The labor participation rate is the lowest since 1981.
So it has gone with nearly every prediction the President has made about
where the economy would be today. Mr. Obama promised that the deficit
would be cut in half in four years, but the fiscal 2012 deficit
(estimated to be above $1 trillion) will be twice the 2008 deficit ($458
billion).
Mr. Obama said that his health-care plan would "cut the cost of a
typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year," but premiums for
employer-sponsored family coverage have gone up $2,370 since 2009,
according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
He said that the linchpin for a growing economy would be renewable
energy investment, and he promised to "create five million new jobs in
solar, wind, geothermal" energy. Mr. Obama did invest some $9 billion in
green energy, but his job estimate was off by at least a factor of 10
and today many solar and wind industry firms are fighting bankruptcy.
The growth in domestic U.S. energy production that he now takes credit
for has come almost entirely from the fossil fuels his Administration
has done so much to obstruct.
Associated Press
There's nothing unusual about candidates making grandiose promises that
don't come true. And it's a White House tradition to blame one's
predecessor when things don't get better. (Usually these Presidents end
up one-termers.)
The bad faith wasn't then. It's now. Mr. Obama really believed that
government spending would unleash a robust recovery in employment and
housing—an "economy built to last." Now that this hasn't happened and
with the Congressional Budget Office predicting a possible recession for
2013, Team Obama claims these woeful results were the best that could
have been expected.
The problem with this line is that every President who has inherited a
recession in modern times has done better. (See nearby table.) Under Mr.
Obama, measured on the basis of jobs, GDP growth and incomes, this has
been by far the meekest recovery from the past 10 recessions.
Ya don't think the party of NO had anything to do with this do ya?
JAM
How many Republican bills were rejected by Dingy Reid?? 36?? he is the
senate Majority leader of DemocRAT No's!
| Sysop: | Nelgin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Plano, TX |
| Users: | 513 |
| Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
| Uptime: | 14:25:03 |
| Calls: | 8,287 |
| Files: | 15,520 |
| Messages: | 928,562 |
