It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me, but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account with the name/handle as "admin".
Eric Oulashin wrote to GitLab note in main/sbbs <=-
<SNIP>
It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me,
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
Digital Man wrote to Gamgee <=-
It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me,
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
That wasn't always the case though: https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/commits/master/text/name.can
If a sysop's SBBS install is 11+ years old, they wouldn't have
"admin" in there (and many other diallowed user names).
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
It's not in my name.can. I've been using Synchronet since 2007,
and maybe "admin" was added to name.can some time after I started
using it?
I've added it now though.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 513 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 04:27:20 |
Calls: | 8,292 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 15,520 |
Messages: | 929,021 |