Node 2:280/5555 has an extra IBN. They all work. ;)
2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554 2001:1c02:1105:4500:f1d0:2:280:5555 Ok.
2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554 83.87.186.49 Ok.
2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido4to6.vlist.eu:24554 185.248.148.18 Ok.
More changes in the prolog, towards it being the IC produced nodelist instead of the Z2C produced version. The epilog now also says: ;S
*** EPILOG-SECTION OF AN IC-SANCTIONED NODELIST > SEP 22 2022 ***
Node 2:280/5555 has an extra IBN. They all work. ;)
2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554 2001:1c02:1105:4500:f1d0:2:280:5555 Ok. 2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554 83.87.186.49 Ok. 2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido4to6.vlist.eu:24554 185.248.148.18
Ok.
Unfortunately I am unable to retrieve the accompanying TIC file, so I
can not check if it actually originates from 2:2/1000 or that it still originates from 2:292/854.
But why two different IBN's? They are both subdomains of vlist.eu, so
both fail if vlist.eu dns fails.
Why not just add multiple A's and AAAA's under one name?
Node 2:280/5555 has an extra IBN. They all work. ;)
2022-09-23 11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554
2001:1c02:1105:4500:f1d0:2:280:5555 Ok. 2022-09-23 11:26:05.676
2:280/5555 fido.vlist.eu:24554 83.87.186.49 Ok. 2022-09-23
11:26:05.676 2:280/5555 fido4to6.vlist.eu:24554 185.248.148.18
Ok.
Why not just add multiple A's and AAAA's under one name?
To indicate that fido4to6 is not the prefered choice. It is my understanding that most systems
will never try the second IBN first.
Why not just add multiple A's and AAAA's under one name?
To indicate that fido4to6 is not the prefered choice. It is my understanding that most systems
will never try the second IBN first.
So it is useless for those "most systems". :)
^^^^^^To indicate that fido4to6 is not the prefered choice. It is my
understanding that most systems will never try the second IBN
first.
So it is useless for those "most systems". :)
So it is useless for those "most systems". :)
Nope. Those "most systems" will try it as a second choice after a
connect with fido.vlist.eu fails.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 510 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 124:15:27 |
Calls: | 8,198 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 15,443 |
Messages: | 913,598 |
Posted today: | 8 |