I run a website, but it does not have high priority as yu cab see when you go take a look. De webserver is a10+ year old freeby named key focus webserver. It does not have IPv6. To make available via IPv6, I used the netsh portproxy method that has been discussed here before.
It did not work very well. It did not work very well. The website was available after a reboot but didn;t stay available for very long. Often just a few hours, sometimes a day or two.
That was then when I had tunnels. But now that I have native IPv6, it has been stable for a week. My website has been reacheable over IPv6 all the time...
That was then when I had tunnels. But now that I have native
IPv6, it has been stable for a week. My website has been
reacheable over IPv6 all the time...
It has to be your XP, because I'm running portproxy at win2003 server without any problems.
That was then when I had tunnels. But now that I have native
IPv6, it has been stable for a week. My website has been
reacheable over IPv6 all the time...
It has to be your XP, because I'm running portproxy at win2003 server
without any problems.
I think it is AICCU or the combination of AICCU and XP. Since I have disabled my SixXs tunnel, the portproxy works OK.
I think it is AICCU or the combination of AICCU and XP. Since I
have disabled my SixXs tunnel, the portproxy works OK.
Ok.. Never heard of AICCU, but after quick googling it seems to be sixxs-only crap. <g>
I'm glad I never got sixxs account. ;)
MvdV> I think it is AICCU or the combination of AICCU and XP. SinceThat was then when I had tunnels. But now that I have native
IPv6, it has been stable for a week. My website has been
reacheable over IPv6 all the time...
It has to be your XP, because I'm running portproxy at win2003
server without any problems.
I'd rather use nginx instead.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 513 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 07:20:59 |
Calls: | 8,287 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 15,517 |
Messages: | 928,382 |
Posted today: | 1 |