@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000405
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000403
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@INTL 2:333/808 2:460/58
@TOPT 7
@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000407
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000406
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@INTL 2:280/464 2:460/58
Is that the original 4096 char message that I just replied to?@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000405
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000403
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@INTL 2:333/808 2:460/58
@TOPT 7
My tosser gave warnings on this message:
14:20:13.107 Processing 89904904.pkt from 2:221/0 to 2:280/464
14:20:13.107 Pkt info: HPT 1.9, Type 2+, 4773, 2020-10-16 14:19:54,
Pwd, Sec
14:20:13.107 Warning: Found netmail kludge in echomail: INTL
2:333/808 2:460/58
14:20:13.107 Warning: Found netmail kludge in echomail: TOPT 7
Bye, Wilfred.
@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000409
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000408
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@INTL 2:280/464 2:460/58
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 1223717052
@REPLYTO 2:221/1.58
@RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
Thanks. Maybe the "netmail kludge" is something Stas added in the new version of the bot? Does THIS message have it too?
@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000409
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000408
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 1223717052
@REPLYTO 2:221/1.58
@RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
@ AA> @ AA> @ AA> @PATH: 460/58 640/1384 712/848 770/1
Thanks. Maybe the "netmail kludge" is something Stas added in the new version of the bot? Does THIS message have it too?
@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000410
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000406
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@INTL 2:280/464 2:460/58
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 534732808
@REPLYTO 2:460/58
@RealName: Stas Mishchenkov 2:460/58
14:20:13.107 Warning: Found netmail kludge in echomail: INTL
2:333/808 2:460/58
Thanks. Hope I fixed it.
Thanks. Maybe the "netmail kludge" is something Stas added in the new version of the bot? Does THIS message have it too?
Didn't have it when I saw the message. It could have been stripped
somewhere along the line. Either that, or HPT strips it when the message
is tossed.
Didn't have it when I saw the message. It could have been stripped somewhere along the line. Either that, or HPT strips it when the message is tossed.
I noticed one thing. In Hpt/JAM the @INTL is not present, but in Hpt/Squish it is. :)
On 17 Oct 2020, 08:52a, Tommi Koivula said the following...
Didn't have it when I saw the message. It could have been stripped
somewhere along the line. Either that, or HPT strips it when the message
is tossed.
I noticed one thing. In Hpt/JAM the @INTL is not present, but in
Hpt/Squish it is. :)
That's strange... Why would it be stripped for JAM? :/
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 509 |
Nodes: | 10 (2 / 8) |
Uptime: | 111:50:38 |
Calls: | 8,194 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 15,442 |
Messages: | 913,278 |
Posted today: | 8 |