• FTSC Administrator

    From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to All on Sun Dec 16 15:00:11 2018
    It is now Sunday, 16 December 2018 (20:00 UTC)
    The period to contest results has ended.

    No challenges have been received.




    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From Ward Dossche@2:292/854 to All on Sun Dec 16 21:38:52 2018
    No challenges have been received.

    Ehr ....

    "What prevented you from answering in netmail? Now everyone knows that long 256-bit hash was used by me, so the confidentiality of the voting has to be considered as compromised.

    If that were a single vote for me (as it was for Carol), I wouldn't give a single fuck. However, there are other people supporting me as a candidate,
    and the difference between me and Andrew is just one vote, so I think we have to repeat with another enumerator".

    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded and not counted while 2 votes went unaccounted for in the final tally?

    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    \%/@rd

    --- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40
    * Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Ward Dossche on Sun Dec 16 21:53:34 2018
    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    To keep up the traffic in the echo of course. DUH...



    ..

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
  • From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to Ward Dossche on Sun Dec 16 15:51:16 2018
    Give it a break, Ward!



    16 Dec 18 21:38, Ward Dossche wrote to All:

    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded

    According to the rules of this election, it WAS NOT a challange.

    Challanges are to be submitted by NetMail to 1:132/174 in the time frame given in the rules. What you quoted was EchoMail in this area.



    2 votes went unaccounted for in the final tally?

    I would mention them in the Final tally (to be posted tomorrow) if i thought you wouldn't cry foul again.

    Those two "votes" were discussed in this area so that everyone who cares already knows what happened. I contacted both of those voters by NetMail and neither one had complaints about what was done.




    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    To give you a chance to flex your muscles?

    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From Ward Dossche@2:292/854 to Björn Felten on Sun Dec 16 22:21:59 2018
    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    To keep up the traffic in the echo of course. DUH...

    Plus the postings of moderator rules ...

    \%/@rd

    --- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40
    * Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to Ward Dossche on Sun Dec 16 13:29:03 2018
    Re: Re: FTSC Administrator
    By: Ward Dossche to All on Sun Dec 16 2018 09:38 pm

    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded and not counted while 2 votes went unaccounted for in the final tally?

    Doesn't bother me (*not* an FTSC member).

    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    So that grown men and women and play government! Isn't this fun?!?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Ward Dossche on Sun Dec 16 22:37:41 2018
    To keep up the traffic in the echo of course. DUH...

    Plus the postings of moderator rules ...

    Nah, that's usually only one message per month. Just a piss in hell.



    ..

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Rob Swindell on Sun Dec 16 22:47:41 2018
    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    So that grown men and women can play government! Isn't this fun?!?

    What a coincident. I've already chosen the Food for Thoughts quote for this week's issue of Fidonews, published in just a couple of hours. Please read it, it reflects another theory. 8-)




    ..

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
  • From Alexey Vissarionov@2:5020/545 to Fred Riccio on Mon Dec 17 19:40:00 2018
    Good ${greeting_time}, Fred!

    16 Dec 2018 15:51:16, you wrote to Ward Dossche:

    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded
    According to the rules of this election, it WAS NOT a challange.

    Really?

    Challanges are to be submitted by NetMail to 1:132/174 in the
    time frame given in the rules. What you quoted was EchoMail in
    this area.

    Excellent... "challenges are accepted only in netmail, where they can be rejected safely". Were some "incorrect" votes rejected the same way?


    --
    Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
    gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

    ... that's why I really dislike fools.
    --- /bin/vi
    * Origin: http://openwall.com/Owl (2:5020/545)
  • From Ward Dossche@2:292/854 to Alexey Vissarionov on Mon Dec 17 21:30:58 2018
    Excellent... "challenges are accepted only in netmail, where they can be rejected safely". Were some "incorrect" votes rejected the same way?

    Indeed ... I would like to know :

    * How many votes were cast
    * How many votes were registered at the enumerator's site
    * How do we know the ballot was not stuffed with fake passwords?
    Releasing the names of the voters without linking to the password would
    take care of thqt
    * How many votes were rejected and for what reason
    * How many challenges were received ... None? Says who? Prove it!

    This was a very poorly managed election. If I were the victor I would not accept the task and immediately call for another election, more transparant and
    with a vote verifier ...

    Amazing that the FTSC-members allow this to happen in plain view of every listed sysop.

    Just imagine if in R24 (Germany) there would be an election and 20% of the votes is unaccounted for ... and a challenge swept under the carpet ... it would be a revolution...

    \%/@rd

    --- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40
    * Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
  • From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to Alexey Vissarionov on Mon Dec 17 19:55:54 2018
    17 Dec 18 19:40, Alexey Vissarionov wrote to Fred Riccio:


    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded

    According to the rules of this election, it WAS NOT a challange.

    Really?

    Read the rules. They were posted here.



    Excellent... "challenges are accepted only in netmail,

    You helped write those rules. Why wait until now to gripe about them? I just followed what was given to me.


    where they can be rejected safely".

    Your words, not mine or part of the rules.



    There were NO challenges. If you think there were, provide logs and I will investigate. Anyone who submitted challenges are invited to post their logs here showing when they were delivered to me. We can discuss it in public.



    Were some "incorrect" votes rejected the same
    way?

    You haven't been paying attention.

    Ward, our unofficial vote verifier, made rejected and/or missing votes public.
    I invited anyone who had a problem with a rejected vote to bring it up here to be discussed and... silence.

    Show me the logs of votes being delivered, but not counted. If this actually happened, they should have been challenged but weren't.

    The election is over. The time frame to submit challenges is over. The voters
    have spoken.

    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to Ward Dossche on Mon Dec 17 20:39:28 2018
    17 Dec 18 21:30, Ward Dossche wrote to Alexey Vissarionov:


    Indeed ... I would like to know :

    * How many votes were cast
    * How many votes were registered at the enumerator's site
    * How do we know the ballot was not stuffed with fake passwords?
    Releasing the names of the voters without linking to the password
    would
    take care of thqt
    * How many votes were rejected and for what reason
    * How many challenges were received ... None? Says who? Prove it!

    I'm tired of your silly games.

    Under the rules of this election, you are not entitled to challenge the results.

    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From Ward Dossche@2:292/854 to Fred Riccio on Tue Dec 18 08:11:25 2018
    Yes, Fred, you were saying ...

    I'm tired of your silly games.

    They are not games as I've got no vested interest in this but you are unable to
    provide several of the replies ...

    Here are some of these ...

    * How many votes were cast

    You have no idea

    * How many votes were registered at the enumerator's site

    Officially 8

    * How do we know the ballot was not stuffed with fake passwords?

    We don't. As there's no vote-verifier there could've easily been no vote
    at all and every password could have been stuffed. Lack of transparancy.

    Releasing the names of the voters without linking to the password
    would take care of that

    This would do no harm to the process, no votes would be revealed

    * How many votes were rejected and for what reason

    I'm guessing Sean Dennis came in too late because of the late sending in
    a time-frame spanning 2 weeks.

    It would've been easy to say:

    "Votes rejected due to time-overrun: 1"

    But really, you do know but we don't and even if we did there is no
    verification

    * How many challenges were received ... None? Says who? Prove it!

    There's no way you can prove there were no challenges. No vote verifier.

    Under the rules of this election, you are not entitled to challenge the results.

    As an answer to legitimate questions that is one of the poorest ones I've ever seen. I'm not challenging the results, merely asking questions and the logical result would be "OK guys, this really looks bad. Let's rethink the rules and do
    this again".

    It's not that the FTSC is going to drop dead if there's an extention of the prevailing situation for a month or two ...

    \%/@rd

    --- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40
    * Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
  • From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to Ward Dossche on Tue Dec 18 09:03:42 2018


    I'm tired of your silly games.

    Under the rules of this election, you are not entitled to challenge the results.


    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Ward Dossche on Tue Dec 18 10:40:48 2018
    On 2018 Dec 16 21:38:52, you wrote to All:

    No challenges have been received.

    Ehr ....

    "What prevented you from answering in netmail? Now everyone knows that
    long
    256-bit hash was used by me, so the confidentiality of the voting has to
    be
    considered as compromised.

    If that were a single vote for me (as it was for Carol), I wouldn't give a single fuck. However, there are other people supporting me as a candidate, and the difference between me and Andrew is just one vote, so I think we have to repeat with another enumerator".

    So everybody is OK that the above challenge is discarded

    i don't read that as a challenge... i just don't see verbiage denoting it as a challenge... it appears to be a couple of statements but not a challenge as one
    might such to be worded... we won't even mention that challenges are/were to be
    sent via netmail ;)

    and not counted while 2 votes went unaccounted for in the final tally?

    really? at least one looked like it was posted after the time period but i'd have to go back and look at the posts to see...

    Oh dear ... what are there elections for then?

    screwing with yer head -=B-)

    )\/(ark

    Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
    Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
    ... Don't let that man make chili. He'd screw up a sacred thing.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From Andrew Leary@1:320/219 to All on Thu Dec 1 03:19:32 2022
    * Forwarded from FTSC by Andrew Leary (1:320/219).
    * Originally by: Andrew Leary (1:320/219), 28 Nov 22 05:08.
    * Originally to: all.

    @MSGID: 1:320/219@fidonet 63848987
    @CHRS: UTF-8 2
    @TZUTC: -0500

    Hello everybody!

    My current term as FTSC Administrator is expiring soon. I am willing to serve another term if needed. Is anyone else interested in the position? If so, please let me know as I will need to get an election organized.

    Andrew

    -+- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
    + Origin: From the Desk of the FTSC Administrator (1:320/219)


    Hello everybody!

    Anyone interested should respond here or send me NetMail.

    Andrew

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
    * Origin: From the Desk of the FTSC Administrator (1:320/219)