So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and make quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty line.
.1.So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make
quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get.2.
the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty
line.
I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
We don't really need initials on every line.
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller Blackberry.
--- tg BBS v0.6.2
* Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)
We don't really need initials on every line.
I beg to differ :)
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have
been written by "AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written
by "AK"(Alexander).
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller
Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it
quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the
likes of GoldED+ et al.
We don't really need initials on every line.
I beg to differ :)
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have
been written by "AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written
by "AK"(Alexander).
I don't have the original in my OpenXP that was dated Dec 1. :(
But I beg to differ on your non-deference. There's a lot of
begging going on.
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller
Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it
quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the
likes of GoldED+ et al.
Isn't there any way to adjust the quoting behaviour of GoldED?
.1.So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make
quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get.2.
the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty
line.
I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
We don't really need initials on every line.
I beg to differ :)
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have been written by "AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written by "AK"(Alexander).
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the likes of GoldED+ et al.
Hello August!
*** Wednesday December 02 2020 03:04, you wrote to Alexander Koryagin:
.1.So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make
quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will.2.
consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get
the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not
necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty
line.
I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have been written by "AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written by "AK"(Alexander).
So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual
and make .1. quoting for the message, you can add your
text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You
press "Unform. sel text" and you get the message with all
lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to
select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by
a empty line. .2. I just tried it. Seems to be a fine
solution.
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller
Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it
quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the
likes of GoldED+ et al.
Hello Martin!
** On Sunday 17.01.21 - 10:52, Martin Foster wrote to August Abolins:
Hello August!
*** Wednesday December 02 2020 03:04, you wrote to Alexander Koryagin:
.1.So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make
quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will AA>> consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get AA>> the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not AA>> necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the AA>> text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty AA>> line..2.
I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have been written by
"AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written by "AK"(Alexander).
That is true. But that is because you allowed the poor
assumptions of the quoting system to mis-quote! <G>
It would be just as easy to take the original, and adjust it to
the follwoing:
So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual
and make .1. quoting for the message, you can add your
text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You
press "Unform. sel text" and you get the message with all
lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to
select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by
a empty line. .2. I just tried it. Seems to be a fine
solution.
Now it is quoted correctly. That was easy, all within OpenXP in
this case. You ought to be able to do so similarly with GoldED,
no?
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller
Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it
quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the
likes of GoldED\+ et al.
I dunno. Here's ANOTHER way that AK's paragraph could have been
quoted, and it seems very easy to "follow".
So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make .1. quoting for the message, you can add your text. All
the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform.
sel text" and you get the message with all lines flowed (one
line paragraps). It is not necessary to select the text lines
if you do operation for all the text. Don't forget that
paragraphs should be separated by a empty line. .2. I just
tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
<<<AK
Works for me!
--
../|ug
I dunno. Here's ANOTHER way that AK's paragraph could have been quoted, and it seems very easy to "follow". AA>>>>
----- The end of the citation -----Works for me!
Hello Martin!
** On Sunday 17.01.21 - 10:52, Martin Foster wrote to August Abolins:
Hello August!
*** Wednesday December 02 2020 03:04, you wrote to Alexander Koryagin:
.1.So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make
quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will AA>> consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get AA>> the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not AA>> necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the AA>> text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty AA>> line..2.
I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have been written by
"AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written by "AK"(Alexander).
That is true. But that is because you allowed the poor
assumptions of the quoting system to mis-quote! <G>
It would be just as easy to take the original, and adjust it to
the follwoing:
So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual
and make .1. quoting for the message, you can add your
text. All the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You
press "Unform. sel text" and you get the message with all
lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not necessary to
select the text lines if you do operation for all the
text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by
a empty line. .2. I just tried it. Seems to be a fine
solution.
Now it is quoted correctly. That was easy, all within OpenXP in
this case. You ought to be able to do so similarly with GoldED,
no?
The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller
Blackberry.
Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it
quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the
likes of GoldED\+ et al.
I dunno. Here's ANOTHER way that AK's paragraph could have been
quoted, and it seems very easy to "follow".
So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
make .1. quoting for the message, you can add your text. All
the quotes will consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform.
sel text" and you get the message with all lines flowed (one
line paragraps). It is not necessary to select the text lines
if you do operation for all the text. Don't forget that
paragraphs should be separated by a empty line. .2. I just
tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
<<<AK
Works for me!
--
../|ug
I dunno. Here's ANOTHER way that AK's paragraph could have been quoted, and it seems very easy to "follow". <AA
----- The end of the citation -----I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution. <<AA
Works for me! <AA
The main problem are the users with smartphone small
displays. For them the paragraphs should be in flowed
manner. In this case citation marks will be good enough.
Another problem is the changing of quotations level. You
put AK>>>. Should be it be counted manually?
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 510 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 132:27:53 |
Calls: | 8,198 |
Files: | 15,446 |
Messages: | 913,806 |