• to pull the door to against

    From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to Paul Quinn on Tue Dec 24 08:30:38 2019
    Hi, Paul Quinn : Alexander Koryagin!
    I read your message from 23.12.2019 09:06

    pulled the door to against the increasing rain.

    Something is unsaid here, as it unnecessary... well, in the
    writer's view. What are the possible conditions for a door to
    remain at rest: open or closed. From the inside, we push a door
    open; or, pull a door closed.

    I see, but in Russia, in such cases, we often ask the interlocutor, "Now say it
    again in a human way." ;)

    It's wet outside. He pulls the door to keep the rain outside. The
    door is closed. Everyone would know this. Pull door, door closes.
    Silly isn't it. :)

    By the way, how should I pronounce the name "Gatsby"? Should the last sound be [ai] or [ee]? No questions if he were Gatsbe. Is there any rule?

    Bye, Paul!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2019

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Paul Quinn@3:640/1384.125 to Alexander Koryagin on Tue Dec 24 18:09:28 2019
    Hi! Alexander,

    On 12/24/2019 04:30 PM, you wrote:

    I see, but in Russia, in such cases, we often ask the interlocutor, "Now say it again in a human way." ;)

    They must be prize-winning tongue-twisters ;)

    By the way, how should I pronounce the name "Gatsby"? Should the last sound be [ai] or [ee]? No questions if he were Gatsbe. Is there any rule?

    The final sound is [ee].

    I don't recall having learned rules that I can recall. I and my classmates at the time (late 1950s) learned the black & blue knuckle way, by rote. Either we
    repeated a method correctly or we were rewarded with a smack to the knuckles (till black & blue).

    Cheers,
    Paul.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
    * Origin: Lymph (v.), to walk with a lisp. (3:640/1384.125)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Paul Quinn on Sat Dec 28 14:20:36 2019
    Hi, Paul! Recently you wrote in a message to Alexander Koryagin:

    What are the possible conditions for a door to remain
    at rest: open or closed.


    Hmm. Unless a door is completely open or closed, it may not remain as you left it... and according to my CANADIAN OXFORD DICTIONARY "pull to" may be used when a boat or a bus comes to a stop in a predetermined location. :-)



    From the inside, we push a door open; or, pull a door
    closed.


    That's what I found confusing here. In Canada the doors of private residences generally open inward, but the doors of public buildings & suchlike generally open outward because of some emergency years ago in which folks were crushed by the mass of others who in their panic didn't realize the person who got to the door first needed to be allowed enough space to open it. Since you live in the southern hemisphere, where everything is upside down, YMMV. And I know very little about how things were done in Long Island a century ago. :-Q



    Pull door, door closes. Silly isn't it. :)


    Problem solved (maybe). With a bit of research I found out that to some folks at least what matters is not the direction of travel toward or away from any humans involved but how close the object is to its designated target. When we "pull a door to", we bring it closer to the door frame. I guess "pull to" makes more sense from the door's POV than it did from mine at first.

    I learned something today, thanks to you. :-)




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12 to Ardith Hinton on Sat Dec 28 18:21:20 2019
    Re: to pull the door to against
    By: Ardith Hinton to Paul Quinn on Sat Dec 28 2019 14:20:36


    When we "pull a door to", we bring it closer to the door frame.

    yup.. same with "push to" (see below)...

    I guess "pull to" makes more sense from the door's POV than it did
    from mine at first.

    then you have folks like myself... i use either "push to" or "pull to" depending on which side of the door the victim will be on when they exit ;)

    "hey, push the door to as you leave" - door opens out

    "pull the door to on your way out" - door opens in

    in either case, the goal of closing the door but not all the way is accomplished...



    )\/(ark
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to August Abolins on Mon Dec 30 21:39:54 2019
    Hi, August Abolins! ->Dallas Hinton
    I read your message from 28.12.2019 04:20

    One time, I needed to replace an interior door to swing in a
    particular direction. All I had at the time was a door with hinges
    on the wrong side. I flipped the door vertically, and voila!..I had
    a door that would operate as required. The hole for the door knob
    was a bit higher as a result, but I didn't need that part. <g> It
    was a door for a utility room, so it didn't have to look pretty and perfect.

    IMHO, you should have done over the hinges on the door, too. Your door at first
    had been hinged from up to down, then, it could be hinged only from down to up.
    You can't just revolt the door and hinge it?

    Bye, August!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2019

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to August Abolins on Fri Dec 27 23:01:03 2019
    Hi August -- on Dec 28 2019 at 03:20, you wrote:

    As an aside, I think the movie versions of that scene depict a
    screen door. Most of those kind do swing to the outside.

    That's interesting - I've never seen the movie(s) but yes, our screen
    door swings out also. Doesn't provide much rain protection, though, as
    it's at least 1/2 screen (the rest is glass).

    One time, I needed to replace an interior door to swing in a
    particular direction. All I had at the time was a door with hinges
    on the wrong side. I flipped the door vertically, and voila! ..I
    had a door that would operate as required. The hole for the door
    knob was a bit higher as a result, but I didn't need that part. <g>
    It was a door for a utility room, so it didn't have to look pretty
    and perfect.

    Perfect!!


    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/NT 1.30+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to All on Mon Dec 23 07:46:12 2019
    Hi, all!

    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    She turned her head as there was a light dignified knocking at the front
    door. I went out and opened it. Gatsby, pale as death, with his hands
    plunged like weights in his coat pockets, was standing in a puddle of
    water glaring tragically into my eyes.

    With his hands still in his coat pockets he stalked by me into the hall,
    turned sharply as if he were on a wire, and disappeared into the living-
    room. It wasn't a bit funny. Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I
    pulled the door to against the increasing rain.
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    It "against" a verb? ;-)

    Bye, all!
    Alexander Koryagin

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Paul Quinn@3:640/1384.125 to Alexander Koryagin on Mon Dec 23 16:06:21 2019
    Hi! Alexander,

    On 12/23/2019 03:46 PM, you wrote to All:

    pulled the door to against the increasing rain.

    Something is unsaid here, as it unnecessary... well, in the writer's view. What are the possible conditions for a door to remain at rest: open or closed.
    From the inside, we push a door open; or, pull a door closed.

    It's wet outside. He pulls the door to keep the rain outside. The door is closed. Everyone would know this. Pull door, door closes. Silly isn't it. :)

    Cheers,
    Paul.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
    * Origin: I used to program in C until I destroyed my FAT... (3:640/1384.125)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Alexander Koryagin on Tue Dec 24 13:56:13 2019
    Hi, Alexander! Recently you wrote in a message to All:

    Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I pulled
    the door to against the increasing rain.

    It "against" a verb? ;-)


    No, it's a preposition. I think the difficulty here is that "to" may
    be used either as a preposition or, less commonly, as an adverb. :-)


    I pulled the door to = I shut the door

    against the rain = to prevent the rain from coming in




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Tue Dec 31 18:03:37 2019
    On 30/12/2019 2:39 p.m., Alexander Koryagin : August Abolins wrote:

    IMHO, you should have done over the hinges on the door, too.
    Your door at first had been hinged from up to down, then, it
    could be hinged only from down to up. You can't just revolt the
    door and hinge it?

    Nope. Did not have to fiddle with the hinges. Upside down, the door swings inwards to the room, and the hinges were on the opposite side, which was perfectly fine!

    In the old original senario, the door swung inwards with the hinges on the right side of the frame.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to Ardith Hinton on Wed Dec 25 08:50:24 2019
    Hi, Ardith Hinton! ->Alexander Koryagin
    I read your message from 24.12.2019 14:56

    Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I pulled the door to
    against the increasing rain.

    It "against" a verb? ;-)

    No, it's a preposition. I think the difficulty here is that "to"
    may be used either as a preposition or, less commonly, as an
    adverb. :-)

    I pulled the door to = I shut the door

    against the rain = to prevent the rain from coming in

    Well, if "to" was a preposition give me an example when it is a adverb.

    Bye, Ardith!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2019

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Thu Dec 26 20:00:27 2019
    On 23/12/2019 12:46 a.m., Alexander Koryagin : All wrote:

    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    [snip]

    With his hands still in his coat pockets he stalked by me into the hall, turned sharply as if he were on a wire, and disappeared into the living- room. It wasn't a bit funny. Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I pulled the door to against the increasing rain.
    ----- The end of the citation -----



    It "against" a verb? ;-)

    Hello Alexander,

    What a strange sentence Fitzgerald is using! At first, I thought this was a printing error. But lo and behold, it is exactly the same in physical print. The sentence would sound better to me without the "to" in front of "against" and still render the meaning well enough.

    But apparently, Fitz is using an archaic form of "against" as a conjunction. The use of the word hear is to mean "in preparation of time or a delay" or "to oppose" something.

    I've read the book many years ago, and don't recall too many issues like the above. I probably just assumed they were printing errors and moved on.

    Hope this helps!

    PS. You picked a challenging book if you want learn english. There are probably many more archaic uses of words in it.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to August Abolins on Thu Dec 26 20:53:06 2019
    Hi, August Abolins! ->Alexander Koryagin
    I read your message from 26.12.2019 21:00

    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    [snip]
    With his hands still in his coat pockets he stalked by me into the hall,
    turned sharply as if he were on a wire, and disappeared into the living-
    room. It wasn't a bit funny. Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I
    pulled the door to against the increasing rain.
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    Is "against" a verb?

    What a strange sentence Fitzgerald is using! At first, I thought
    this was a printing error. But lo and behold, it is exactly the
    same in physical print. The sentence would sound better to me
    without the "to" in front of "against" and still render the meaning
    well enough.

    But apparently, Fitz is using an archaic form of "against" as a conjunction. The use of the word hear is to mean "in preparation of
    time or a delay" or "to oppose" something.

    I've read the book many years ago, and don't recall too many issues
    like the above. I probably just assumed they were printing errors
    and moved on.

    I also tried to find some information on this account, and I found out that "pull to" is an idiom, and when used with "door" it means:

    https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/pull+to
    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    2. To drag, tug, or yank something shut. A noun or pronoun is used between "pull" and "to."
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    So in normal language the sentence will look like this:

    "... I closed the door because the rain was increasing."

    Bye, August!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2019

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Thu Dec 26 21:43:24 2019
    On 26/12/2019 1:53 p.m., Alexander Koryagin : August Abolins wrote:

    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    [snip]
    ..I pulled the door to against the increasing rain.
    ----- The end of the citation -----


    https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/pull+to
    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    2. To drag, tug, or yank something shut. A noun or pronoun is used between "pull" and "to."
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    So in normal language the sentence will look like this:
    "... I closed the door because the rain was increasing."

    Excellent! So, why couldn't Fitz just write that, eh? <G> The story is set in
    the 20's, so the English that people spoke wasn't *that* archaic.

    BTW, "to pull the door" would indicate to me that it was an outward swinging door that he was trying to close from the inside and the "against" may be attempting to imply a heavy rain beating at the door at the moment.

    If I recall correctly, the narrator is staying in a cottage next door to Gatsby's mansion. The cottage may have only had a flimsy door that the rain could beat against very easily.

    For a read consistent with the season, try Dicken's A Christmas Carol. There are few archaic language samples in that one!

    BTW.. I am liking your Reformator program very much! I think I got the right routine of copy-paste-quote-copy-paste that works for me. I like the way it skips quoting the citing section.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Dallas Hinton@1:153/7715 to August Abolins on Thu Dec 26 19:46:09 2019
    Hi August -- on Dec 26 2019 at 21:43, you wrote:

    Excellent! So, why couldn't Fitz just write that, eh? <G> The
    story is set in the 20's, so the English that people spoke wasn't
    *that* archaic.

    He was a bit weird! :-)

    BTW, "to pull the door" would indicate to me that it was an outward swinging door that he was trying to close from the inside and the
    "against" may be attempting to imply a heavy rain beating at the
    door at the moment.

    To make matters worse, in this country and in the US, most front doors
    swing inward so as not to hit the person standing outside!

    If I recall correctly, the narrator is staying in a cottage next
    door to Gatsby's mansion. The cottage may have only had a flimsy
    door that the rain could beat against very easily.

    I'd think the quality of the door would have less to do with raining
    beating than would the presence or absence of a roof or overhang on the outside?

    For a read consistent with the season, try Dicken's A Christmas
    Carol. There are few archaic language samples in that one!

    Good recomendation - although quite a few cultural references won't be
    very clear!

    Cheers... Dallas

    --- timEd/NT 1.30+
    * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to mark lewis on Mon Jan 6 23:46:40 2020
    Hi, Mark! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    I guess "pull to" makes more sense from the door's POV
    than it did from mine at first.

    then you have folks like myself... i use either "push
    to" or "pull to" depending on which side of the door
    the victim will be on when they exit ;)

    "hey, push the door to as you leave" - door opens out

    "pull the door to on your way out" - door opens in


    In any number of other circumstances "pull" would mean your victim is
    applying force toward him/herself. If the verb tells us the direction in which
    the force is to be applied & the adverb tells us where you'd like the action to
    stop, you could theoretically use "push" or "pull". I suspect "pull to" may be
    an idiomatic expression, however... meaning it's an "exception" to the "rules".
    the usual rules in which casuch cases the rules are different.



    in either case, the goal of closing the door but not all
    the way is accomplished...


    WRT the excerpt Alexander cited, I figure the narrator would probably
    have closed the door all the way. But I can see that if a bus stops to pick up
    &/or discharge passengers or if a boat is being tied up at the wharf it's usual
    to allow for a bit of open space between such expen$ive means of transportation
    & any fixed objects which might potentially damage them. By the same reckoning
    my CANADIAN OXFORD defines "to" as "a nearly closed position" when "pull to" is
    used in reference to a door... and it sounds to me as if that's the way you use
    the adverb. Other sources, if they list the phrase, seem divided as to whether
    or not the action in such cases goes on until the door is firmly shut. As long
    as your family & friends know what you mean, I guess that's what matters. They
    can ask you in person if they don't. But we can't ask Mr. Fitzgerald.... :-))




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to August Abolins on Fri Dec 27 10:33:42 2019
    Hi, August Abolins! - >Alexander Koryagin
    I read your message from 26.12.2019 22:43

    For a read consistent with the season, try Dicken's A Christmas
    Carol. There are few archaic language samples in that one!

    "The Great Gatsby" was presented me as a paper book. I like English paper books
    very much because I can do my notes on pages. When I complete reading I peruse all the notes and refresh in memory those words that were new or unclear when I
    read the book. It is a more effective way to learn words.

    BTW.. I am liking your Reformator program very much! I think I got
    the right routine of copy-paste-quote-copy-paste that works for me.
    I like the way it skips quoting the citing section.

    I also want to clarify some formatting options. If you do just "format" it means that both quoted and not-quoted text will be wrapped - the lines will be chopped by "line length".

    If you make "unformat not-quoted text only" the quoted paragraphs will be formatted, but the simple text paragraphs become in the form of one long line -- the form that looks well on the screens of any size. That's why we rather should not format "our simple text" while writing messages to the Fidonet. Now many people write messages to the Fidonet using small gadgets with narrow screens (like smart phones). We should think of them.

    After completing your message it is a good idea to select all the text (except the title) and make "unformat not-quoted text only".

    Usually, when you read messages, standard Fidonet software unformat the paragraphs with quotation by itself, so they look well at the screens of any size. But simple text in the form of chopped lines will look badly on small size gadgets.


    PS: But nobody demands to write here in a super perfect way! ;-))

    Bye, August!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2019

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Dallas Hinton on Sat Dec 28 03:20:21 2019
    In a post between "Dallas Hinton : August Abolins", on 12/26/2019 12:46 PM

    BTW, "to pull the door" would indicate to me that it was an
    outward swinging door that he was trying to close..

    To make matters worse, in this country and in the US, most
    front doors swing inward so as not to hit the person
    standing outside!

    Hi Dallas,

    As an aside, I think the movie versions of that scene depict a screen door. Most of those kind do swing to the outside.

    One time, I needed to replace an interior door to swing in a particular direction. All I had at the time was a door with hinges on the wrong side. I flipped the door vertically, and voila! ..I had a door that would operate as required. The hole for the door knob was a bit higher as a result, but I didn't
    need that part. <g> It was a door for a utility room, so it didn't have to look pretty and perfect.


    ../|ug

    --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Ardith Hinton@1:153/716 to Alexander Koryagin on Thu Jan 9 23:26:08 2020
    Hi, Alexander! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

    I think the difficulty here is that "to" may be used
    either as a preposition or, less commonly, as an adverb.


    BTW... I deliberately grouped the words together as an adult native speaker of English might when I said:


    I pulled the door to = I shut the door

    against the rain = to prevent the rain from coming in


    Some folks get hung up
    on the idea
    that traditional grammar
    doesn't work in English,
    although it works in Latin.
    I prefer it because,
    while I find it difficult at times
    to shoehorn my thoughts
    into eight parts of speech,
    my dictionaries & my friends
    from various other countries
    use the same system.



    Well, if "to" was a preposition


    In the average English/English desk dictionary you'll probably find the first umpteen definitions categorized that way. Keep going... [chuckle].



    give me an example when it is a adverb.
    |an


    When it is defined by reputable sources as "toward a contact point" &/or "in the usual or required position" and does *not* begin a prepositional phrase it's an adverb AFAIC. That was my analysis of "I pulled the door to", but I understand it's not easy to track these things down. :-)

    Other examples, not all of which fit the above description quite so neatly but which tell us the direction &/or the timing of some action:


    to and fro = back and forth
    come to = regain consciousness
    heave to (naut.) = bring or be brought to a standstill
    turn to = begin work
    wrong side to = wrong side forward


    I hope this helps.... :-)




    --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Sun Feb 16 18:48:52 2020
    Alexander Koryagin:

    She turned her head as there was a light dignified
    knocking at the front door. I went out and opened it.
    Gatsby, pale as death, with his hands plunged like
    weights in his coat pockets, was standing in a puddle
    of water glaring tragically into my eyes.

    With his hands still in his coat pockets he stalked by
    me into the hall, turned sharply as if he were on a
    wire, and disappeared into the living-room. It wasn't
    a bit funny. Aware of the loud beating of my own heart
    I pulled the door to against the increasing rain.

    It "against" a verb? ;-)

    No, but "to" is not a sign of the infinitive either. It is
    a preposition depending on "pull" and acting upon an implied
    noun (jamb): pull the door snugly to the jamb to shut off
    bad weather.

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to Anton Shepelev on Sun Feb 16 20:56:18 2020
    Hi, Anton Shepelev! ->Alexander Koryagin
    I read your message from 16.02.2020 19:48

    a bit funny. Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I pulled
    the door to against the increasing rain.
    Is "against" a verb?

    No, but "to" is not a sign of the infinitive either. It is a
    preposition depending on "pull" and acting upon an implied noun
    (jamb): pull the door snugly to the jamb to shut off bad weather.

    I hope I'll read this book to the end. ;)

    Bye, Anton!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2020

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Sun Feb 16 21:06:14 2020
    Alexander Koryagin:

    I hope I'll read this book to the end. ;)

    Great Gatsby? If you ask me, you might as well put it down
    and take Huxley's Crome Yellow.

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Sun Feb 16 21:11:42 2020
    Alexander Koryagin:

    Well, if "to" was a preposition give me an example when
    it is a adverb.

    It is a matter of terminology. I say "to" is a preposition
    acting upon an implied noun. Someone else can say it is an
    adverb insomuch as it has no explicit noun upon which to
    act.

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Sun Feb 16 21:16:52 2020
    Alexander Koryagin:

    So in normal language the sentence will look like this:

    "... I closed the door because the rain was increasing."

    It has a different meaning for two reasons: "close" can mean
    more than just pulling to, and there is no indication of
    increasing rain in the original. In that sentence, Gatsby's
    language *is* normal, euphonic, and brief.

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Alexander Koryagin@2:221/360 to Anton Shepelev on Mon Feb 17 08:15:24 2020
    Hi, Anton Shepelev : Alexander Koryagin!
    I read your message from 16.02.2020 22:16

    So in normal language the sentence will look like this:
    "... I closed the door because the rain was increasing."

    It has a different meaning for two reasons: "close" can mean more
    than just pulling to, and there is no indication of increasing rain
    in the original.

    There is no indication of increasing rain?
    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I
    pulled the door to against the increasing rain.
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    In that sentence, Gatsby's language *is* normal,
    euphonic, and brief.

    Why have you removed the citation?

    https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/pull+to
    -----Beginning of the citation-----
    2. To drag, tug, or yank something shut. A noun or pronoun is used between "pull" and "to."
    ----- The end of the citation -----

    IMHO "shut" speaks clearly about the result of the action.

    Bye, Anton!
    Alexander Koryagin
    english_tutor 2020

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Anton Shepelev@2:221/360 to Alexander Koryagin on Mon Feb 17 11:16:12 2020
    Alexander Koryagin to Anton Shepelev:

    "Aware of the loud beating of my own heart I pulled
    the door to against the increasing rain."

    So in normal language the sentence will look like
    this:
    "... I closed the door because the rain was
    increasing."

    It has a different meaning for two reasons: "close" can
    mean more than just pulling to, and there is no
    indication of increasing rain in the original. In
    that sentence, Gatsby's language *is* normal, euphonic,
    and brief.

    There is no indication of increasing rain?
    Why have you removed the citation?

    Because of haste and lazyness :-(

    Observe that it does not matter whether the rain is
    increasing or not insomuch as it is heavy and aslant, so I
    propose to mark that it was increasing in a parenthetical
    expression:

    He shut the door to block rain, which was increasing.

    IMHO "shut" speaks clearly about the result of the
    action.

    I think it may imply locking.

    ---
    * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)