• Rationing: A fairer way to fight climate

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Mon Feb 20 21:30:30 2023
    Rationing: A fairer way to fight climate change?

    Date:
    February 20, 2023
    Source:
    University of Leeds
    Summary:
    World War II-style rationing could be an effective way to reduce
    carbon emissions, according to new research.


    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email
    FULL STORY ========================================================================== World War II-style rationing could be an effective way to reduce carbon emissions, according to new research from the University of Leeds.


    ==========================================================================
    In a paper published today in the journal Ethics, Policy and Environment, academics argue that rationing could help states to reduce greenhouse
    gas emissions rapidly and fairly.

    Policymakers have considered other schemes to reduce emissions, including carbon taxes and personal carbon trading schemes, but the researchers
    say these favour the wealthy, who could buy the right to pollute if
    trading were allowed.

    The authors argue that carbon rationing would instead allow people
    to receive an equitable portion of resources based on their needs,
    therefore sharing out the effort to protect the planet.

    The authors were based across the University of Leeds' Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied Centre, Sustainability Research Institute and School of
    History when they conducted the research.

    Joint lead author Dr Nathan Wood, who is now a Postdoctoral Fellow
    at Utrecht University's Fair Energy Consortium, said: "The concept of
    rationing could help, not only in the mitigation of climate change, but
    also in reference to a variety of other social and political issues --
    such as the current energy crisis." Lessons from the past Records from
    World War II show that compulsory food rationing was more acceptable
    to the UK public than voluntary changes to diet when resources became
    scarce. The policy aimed to share goods and burdens more equally,
    regardless of wealth, which was an important part of its popularity
    and success.

    Historic rationing policies also introduced price controls on goods to
    keep key resources affordable for most people. As a result, rates of malnutrition went down during World War II, despite the shortages.

    A key difference between World War II rationing and the climate crisis
    is public perception, the researchers say. The availability of thousands
    of garments, gadgets and goods at the click of a button can give the
    illusion that resources are available in abundance, but the reality is
    starkly different.

    Dr Rob Lawlor, joint lead author and Lecturer at Leeds' Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied Centre, said: "There is a limit to how much we can emit
    if we are to reduce the catastrophic impacts of climate change. In this
    sense, the scarcity is very real." Dr Wood said: "The cost of living
    crisis has shown what happens when scarcity drives up prices, with energy prices rising steeply and leaving vulnerable groups unable to pay their
    bills. Currently, those living in energy poverty cannot use anywhere
    near their fair share of energy supply, whereas the richest in society
    are free to use as much energy as they can afford." Dr Lawlor added:
    "It seems feasible to reduce emissions overall even while the lowest
    emitters, often the worst off, may be able to increase their emissions -
    - not despite rationing, but because of rationing and price controls."
    What equitable rationing could look like The researchers suggest that
    rationing probably wouldn't be the first step.

    Instead, policy changes could start with stricter regulations and
    an accompanying information campaign to communicate the benefits of
    rationing.

    Initially, governments could regulate the biggest polluters, such as
    oil, gas and petrol, long-haul flights and intensive farming, creating
    scarcity in products that harm the planet. Rationing could then be
    introduced gradually, to manage the resulting scarcity with the aim of
    meeting everyone's basic needs.

    The academics identified two options for rationing policy. Policymakers
    could introduce an all-encompassing carbon allowance, giving out
    'carbon cards' like bank cards to track and limit usage. Alternatively, governments could ration specifically selected goods, such as flights,
    petrol, household energy, or even meat or clothing.

    Dr Lawlor said: "Many have proposed carbon allowances and carbon cards
    before.

    What is new (or old, taking inspiration from World War II) is the idea
    that the allowances should not be tradable. Another feature of World
    War II-style rationing is that price controls on rationed goods would
    prevent prices from rising with increased demand, benefitting those
    with the least money." According to the researchers, it's likely that rationing would accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to cleaner
    energy and more sustainable lifestyles.

    Dr Wood said: "For example, rationing petrol could encourage greater use
    of, and investment in, low carbon public transport, such as railways and
    local trams." The researchers hope the paper will inspire policymakers
    to consider rationing as a serious option for fighting climate change.

    * RELATED_TOPICS
    o Earth_&_Climate
    # Environmental_Policy # Global_Warming #
    Environmental_Awareness # Sustainability
    o Science_&_Society
    # World_Development # Resource_Shortage # Energy_Issues
    # Social_Issues
    * RELATED_TERMS
    o Climate_engineering o Warfare o Western_world
    o Automobile_emissions_control o Mass_media o
    Climate_change_mitigation o Carbon_dioxide_sink o
    United_Nations_Framework_Convention_on_Climate_Change

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Leeds. Note: Content
    may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Nathan Wood, Rob Lawlor, Josie Freear. Rationing and Climate Change
    Mitigation*. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 2023; 1 DOI: 10.1080/
    21550085.2023.2166342 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/02/230220121859.htm

    --- up 51 weeks, 10 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)