instruction Halt and Catch Fire (HCF), the execution of which would
cause the computer's central processing unit to stop working (catch fire
Has anyone else here seen it?
Yes, I enjoyed it... the episodes about the technical stuff
more than some of the others that get more into the
interpersonal stuff. That is also good TV but I really got
into their push to build a PC and some of their later
endeavors.
On 5/10/2020 6:51 PM, between "Mike Powell : AUGUST ABOLINS":
Except for using the early unix-based networked computers on campus,
my first use of a PC was a genuine IBM PC in my first professional
job in 1993.
I had heard that the originel Intel 4004 had a HCF instruction that effectively shorted +5V to GND via the CPU, letting the magic smoke out.
@MSGID: <5EB84FBA.883.clascomp@capitolcityonline.net>
I just learned of this series:
It sounds very interesting for a computer nerd.
Has anyone else here seen it?
On 05-16-20 09:52, John Riley wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
I had heard that the originel Intel 4004 had a HCF instruction that effectively shorted +5V to GND via the CPU, letting the magic smoke out.
Ah, never heard of it being on the 4004.
I dragged myself through episode 3 (1st season). There was stuff in there that
seemed unnecessary and a bit of a distraction.
There is a lot of stuff like, too. IIRC, it almost did not come back for a
second season.
A couple years later, I had a 286/AT AMD based. I started
goofing around with RBBS BBS software on that.
RBBS is supposedly open source now (may have been then,
too). I have thought about playing around with it some one
day, but never seem to get around to it.
On 05-13-20 13:05, John Riley wrote to August Abolins <=-
instruction Halt and Catch Fire (HCF), the execution of which would
cause the computer's central processing unit to stop working (catch fire
Yep, specifically on the 6800 series CPU's.
I dragged myself through episode 3 (1st season). There was stuff in there that
seemed unnecessary and a bit of a distraction.
I think it was in episode 2 that the ex-IBM guy convinces the engineer to use h
s own money to buy the computer equipment for reverse engineering. I found that
unrealistic. The ex-IBM guy is surely still quite wealthy (fancy car, fancy ap
rtment, fancy clothes, etc..) Yet, it is the family-man who has to come up with
the money for the computer equipment? That made little sense.
The production values feel like a low-budget Canadian series. I can look past >hat and focus on the tech/engineering elements. I read that things pick up nic
ly in ep 4 and onward.
Except for using the early unix-based networked computers on campus, my first u
e of a PC was a genuine IBM PC in my first professional job in 1993. But even >here, I primarily worked with a DEC VAX 11 machine. I had a shared terminal pa
ked just outside my cubicle intended to be split between 5 people. Honestly, I
can't remember what I needed to use it for except to lookup or print some basic
reports based on parts inventory. Boring! But I did help some people "fix" th
ir report programs when they needed a special feature.
A couple years later, I had a 286/AT AMD based. I started goofing around with >RBBS BBS software on that.
CORRECTION. I meant, "1983" I hate using the top row of keys for the number
! I tend to overcompensate and miss.
Has anyone else here seen it?
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 606 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 100:29:08 |
Calls: | 9,651 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 16,070 |
Messages: | 1,065,040 |
Posted today: | 4 |