• Study Suggests There Are 300 Million

    From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to All on Wed Nov 11 09:40:35 2020
    Forwarding message from ASTRONET
    Originally by: Charles Pierson, 2:240/1120.976
    Original date: 11/11/20 8:13 AM
    Subject: Study Suggests There Are 300 Million
    ***

    Hello, All.


    Study Suggests There Are 300 Million Potentially Habitable Worlds in Our Galaxy

    November 9, 2020



    By Tim Binnall

    An exhaustive new study from NASA has concluded that there could be a whopping 300 million habitable worlds in the Milky Way galaxy. The intriguing determination reportedly came by way of a two-year-long project in which 44 astronomers studied data collected by the Kepler Telescope. Seen as the culmination of that exoplanet-hunting spacecraft's work, one of the scientists on the team marveled to the New York Times that "this is the science result we've all been waiting for" and "the reason that Kepler was selected for flight in December 2001."

    Specifically, the team combed through the voluminous Kepler data and found that "half the stars similar in temperature to our Sun could have a rocky planet capable of supporting liquid water on its surface." Taking into account insights gleaned from the European Space Agency's Gaia mission, which looked at the type of energy emitted from these stars and how it is absorbed by the planets that orbit them, they ultimately came to the figure of 300 million potentially habitable exoplanets in our galaxy based on "the most conservative estimate that 7% of Sun-like stars host such worlds." Considering that is a cautious guess, scientists say, the true number of such exoplanets could be significantly higher.

    While that enormous number should give optimism to those hoping to eventually find some kind of intelligent life out there in space, some researchers cautioned that one might wish to temper their expectations. That's because scientists have yet to identify an exoplanet which is the same size as Earth and possesses a matching orbit around a Sun-like star, which are, as of yet, the only conditions known to produce life. Be that as it may, it stands to reason that there ought to be at least one such world among the 300 million theoretically habitable exoplanets in our galaxy. How long it may take us to find it, of course, remains to be seen.


    ...

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Thu Nov 12 20:06:00 2020
    On 11-11-20 09:40, Charles Pierson wrote to All <=-

    Study Suggests There Are 300 Million Potentially Habitable Worlds in
    Our Galaxy

    Wow. It will be interesting to see what proportion of those planets in the habitable zone are actually habitable, and how many actually support life. And specificallt what those worlds have in common (including Earth). :)


    ... Those who bring sunshine to others cannot keep it from them themselves.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Thu Nov 12 06:22:47 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/12/20 8:06 PM you wrote:

    On 11-11-20 09:40, Charles Pierson wrote to All <=-
    Study Suggests There Are 300 Million Potentially Habitable Worlds
    in Our Galaxy
    Wow. It will be interesting to see what proportion of those
    planets in the habitable zone are actually habitable, and how many actually support life. And specificallt what those worlds have in
    common (including Earth). :)

    I'm still stunned they are finding planets based on the flickering of the star as it passes in front of our view.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Fri Nov 13 20:43:00 2020
    On 11-12-20 06:22, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    I'm still stunned they are finding planets based on the flickering of
    the star as it passes in front of our view.

    Yes, that's a pretty impressive technical feat. :)


    ... Features should be discovered, not documented.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Fri Nov 13 06:11:48 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/13/20 8:43 PM you wrote:

    On 11-12-20 06:22, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
    I'm still stunned they are finding planets based on the
    flickering of the star as it passes in front of our view.
    Yes, that's a pretty impressive technical feat. :)

    It really is. But with the distances involved, I suppose that there isn't another way to do it.



    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Sat Nov 14 20:55:00 2020
    On 11-13-20 06:11, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    It really is. But with the distances involved, I suppose that there
    isn't another way to do it.

    Actually, there's several methods for discovering exoplanets, which include:

    Radial velocity - detecting the "wobble" of the star as planets orbit it. And they can detect multiple planets here. This works by using Doppler shift of the light from the star.

    Direct imaging - yes, in some rare cases, it is possible!

    Gravitational microlensing - seeing the effect of the planet's gravity on distant starlight passing by.

    Astrometry - Similar to radial velocity, except looking at how the position of the host star changes as it "wobbles" with the orbiting planets, instead of Doppler shift.

    And of course, we've been discussing the transit method in this thread.

    Ref: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/alien-worlds/ways-to-find-a-planet/#


    There are other methods, but they are still fairly experimental. :)


    ... But that trick never works! -Rocky
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Sat Nov 14 06:24:20 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/14/20 8:55 PM you wrote:

    On 11-13-20 06:11, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
    It really is. But with the distances involved, I suppose that
    there isn't another way to do it.
    Actually, there's several methods for discovering exoplanets,
    which include: Radial velocity - detecting the "wobble" of the
    star as planets orbit it. And they can detect multiple planets
    here. This works by using Doppler shift of the light from the
    star. Direct imaging - yes, in some rare cases, it is possible! Gravitational microlensing - seeing the effect of the planet's
    gravity on distant starlight passing by. Astrometry - Similar to
    radial velocity, except looking at how the position of the host
    star changes as it "wobbles" with the orbiting planets, instead of Doppler shift. And of course, we've been discussing the transit
    method in this thread. Ref: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/alien-worlds/ways-to-find-a-planet/#
    There are other methods, but they are still fairly experimental.
    :)

    I stand corrected, although, honestly, many of those methods do seem variations of a theme.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Mon Nov 16 18:53:00 2020
    On 11-14-20 06:24, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    I stand corrected, although, honestly, many of those methods do seem variations of a theme.

    Some are variations, but not all. :)

    Radial Velocity was the leading method in the early years, but Keplet changed that, with its use of the transit method.


    ... Reality crept in. I nailed it for trespassing.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Mon Nov 16 06:29:11 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/16/20 6:53 PM you wrote:

    On 11-14-20 06:24, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
    I stand corrected, although, honestly, many of those methods do
    seem variations of a theme.
    Some are variations, but not all. :) Radial Velocity was the
    leading method in the early years, but Keplet changed that, with
    its use of the transit method.

    I'll have to go back and read up on those methods.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Tue Nov 17 18:33:00 2020
    On 11-16-20 06:29, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    I'll have to go back and read up on those methods.

    Yes, worth a read. It's a fascinating area of both science and engineering. Finding these planets is one thing, getting there is going to take a LOT longer! :D


    ... I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Tue Nov 17 06:32:23 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/17/20 6:33 PM you wrote:

    On 11-16-20 06:29, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
    I'll have to go back and read up on those methods.
    Yes, worth a read. It's a fascinating area of both science and engineering. Finding these planets is one thing, getting there is
    going to take a LOT longer! :D

    Much, much longer.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Thu Nov 19 19:12:00 2020
    On 11-17-20 06:32, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    Yes, worth a read. It's a fascinating area of both science and engineering. Finding these planets is one thing, getting there is
    going to take a LOT longer! :D

    Much, much longer.

    Indeed. Wonder if we'll ever find a way to get there in a convenient amount of time. :)


    ... Infertility is unlikely to be passed on.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tony Langdon on Thu Nov 19 20:52:50 2020
    Hello, Tony Langdon.
    On 11/19/20 7:12 PM you wrote:

    On 11-17-20 06:32, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
    Yes, worth a read. It's a fascinating area of both science and
    engineering. Finding these planets is one thing, getting there
    is going to take a LOT longer! :D
    Much, much longer.
    Indeed. Wonder if we'll ever find a way to get there in a
    convenient amount of time. :)

    Anything is possible.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Tony Langdon@3:633/410 to Charles Pierson on Fri Nov 20 18:47:00 2020
    On 11-19-20 20:52, Charles Pierson wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

    Indeed. Wonder if we'll ever find a way to get there in a
    convenient amount of time. :)

    Anything is possible.

    Given enough time, and there's still a lot about fundamental physics that we don't know.


    ... Never assume the obvious is true!
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to Charles Pierson on Sun Dec 6 10:19:43 2020
    Forwarding message from ASTRONET
    Originally by: Charles Pierson, 2:240/1120.976
    Original date: 11/11/20 8:13 AM
    Subject: Study Suggests There Are 300 Million

    An exhaustive new study from NASA has concluded that there could be a whopping 300 million habitable worlds in the Milky Way galaxy..

    I can just picture these scientists "exhausted" and slumped over their desks.

    :)

    I am not entirely impressed by the study. Is it really any different than saying
    "with enough monkeys, they could write Shakespeare".
    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)