The price of progress?
The price of progress?I'm concluding this proves Fudd's First Law. :-)
Agreed. Looks good from all the angles too.
Agreed. Looks good from all the angles too.
Indeed it does, but is it stable? You know as well as I do that it has gone awry in the past which is why there is a back door ... actually two back doors given where you replied from.
Remember when we used to point off there? Them were the days eh? :::sigh:::
You know, this does sound rather schizophrenic, discussing issues
with yourself in public! Everything alright overthere? ;)
Remember when we used to point off there? Them were the days eh? :::sigh:::
@MSGID: 1:153/7001 5ade73abType
Attention Ming,
One last attempt to bridge the gap between here and the planet Mongo.
2+ pktheader which is the same as the only message that found it's waypast
what appears to be a black hole on this particular path. If this onefails
then the best guess is that these tests are just adding fuel to the potential black hole which just makes a bad situation worse as far as interplanetary fidonet messaging is concerned. :::sigh:::
The price of progress?
End transmission.
... Fudd's First Law of Opposition:
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001) SEEN-BY: 116/116 123/25 120 141 150 755 135/300 138/146 153/150 250 757 7001
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 261/38 3634/12 15 22 27 50
@PATH: 153/7001 7715 3634/12
You know, this does sound rather schizophrenic, discussing issues
with yourself in public! Everything alright overthere? ;)
Don't encourage them.
End transmission.
... Newton's Little-known Seventh Law:
A bird in the hand is safer than one overhead.
I donot know how Little you are
First it should be EOT as the abbriviation is End Of Transmission.
And still the transmission did not end
Thank you. Given the almost direct path to your system was the message reformatted?
i went back and looked at the original and it did attempt to use
the full width of my terminal
As far as 1:153/7001 is concerned there wasn't and still isn't
any unneeded linefeeds in the message bodies up to and including
this one.
theAs far as 1:153/7001 is concerned there wasn't and still isn't
any unneeded linefeeds in the message bodies up to and including
this one.
You'll be disappointed to hear that both your replies to mark have been obviously reformatted somewhere along the line. Given the "PATH: 153/7001 7715 250 770/1 280/464 154/10", we know it isn't 1:153/7001 or 1:154/10, and according to mark probably not 1:153/7715. That leaves three along
path to choose from.
i went back and looked at the original and it did attempt to use the
full width of my terminal
Is your terminal width greater than 80 characters?
For the record, you were the one who pointed out that the messages originating from here were DOS-think handicapped in the first place.
As far as 1:153/7001 is concerned there wasn't and still isn't
any unneeded linefeeds in the message bodies up to and including
this one.
You'll be disappointed to hear that both your replies to mark have been obviously reformatted somewhere along the line.
Given the "PATH: 153/7001 7715 250 770/1 280/464 154/10", we know it
isn't 1:153/7001 or 1:154/10, and according to mark probably not 1:153/7715. That leaves three along the path to choose from.
Speaking for myself, I honestly don't care as long as it is understood that the work originating on 1:153/7001 is of superior quality and if
it isn't then everything within this node's power will be done to
remedy the situation. I suggest this issue be immediately dropped and
we carry on with matters that really matter and are within our grasp
to do something about.
Since I'm one of those... I very much doubt that fmail is
changing intransit mail.
But if you want to test this in a more direct way, you're
welcome to get a link here.
But if you want to test this in a more direct way, you're
welcome to get a link here.
What would be of greater interest to me is a European node number. I have a spare static IP address that is currently on a different machine I'd be more than happy to dedicate to that cause.
I can only offer a point number...
But if you want to test this in a more direct way, you're welcome to
get a link here.
What would be of greater interest to me is a European node number.
I have a spare static IP address that is currently on a different
machine I'd be more than happy to dedicate to that cause.
whatever for? it won't make any difference in mail processing... it won't make
any difference in mail flow, either...
just get another node number and link to some systems in other zones if you're
looking for message altering problems...
What signoff would you think might be better than "End transmission"?
"End transmission" does not give warm feelings.
Good luck with your projects.
Not that it is any of your business, my real motivation is to ensure connectivity for myself if and when a network packs it in for whatever reason, good or bad. I've had too much experience with disappearing fidonet networks.
so you're looking to do the fidoweb type connectivity thing
If I had to guess it would be because you are blinded by the
obvious hardon you have for DOS-think.
so you're looking to do the fidoweb type connectivity thing
Again NO!!! I have gone out of my way to avoid web apps
If I had to guess it would be because you are blinded by the obvious
hardon you have for DOS-think.
AMEN!!! Way to go. Tell it like it is. :-)
let us know if you would like some salt for that crow after you
read my previous message ;)
it is a mesh of systems making a spider's web of links
let us know if you would like some salt for that crow after you read
my previous message ;)
My doctor has me on a low sodium crow diet, so no thank you.
it is a mesh of systems making a spider's web of links
Ah! Errr ... again no. Everything is completely independent of the other including the machines they are running on.
what probably matters most is your raw PKT methodology not using
any message bases
if you were tossing the messages into some sort of message base
with dupe checking, you'd be OK
what probably matters most is your raw PKT methodology not using
any message bases
If I am not using message bases then how do these messages find themselves in the correct echoarea?
if you were tossing the messages into some sort of message base
with dupe checking, you'd be OK
Whose dupes am I checking for?
If the inbound, then I'd suggest that it is too late for dupe checking
if dupes are getting past the system(s) upstream.
None of them are finding their way past this system, not that there
have been any dupes in this short space of time since the EuroPoint
came online.
let us know if you would like some salt for that crow after you
read my previous message ;)
My doctor has me on a low sodium crow diet, so no thank you.
My doctor has me on a low sodium crow diet, so no thank you.
there is such a thing as low sodium salt, ya know ;)
one can easily read and reply to messages in raw PKTs and have
them appear in any areas they want simply by specifying the
desired area in the AREA control line
others to feed you the messages you would have missed from the
dead link
my understanding has been that you're basically using raw PKTs
i don't recall you ever stating what message base format you are
using
"End transmission" does not give warm feelings.
Machines don't have feelings.
Good luck with your projects.
... Preudhomme's Law of Window Cleaning: It's on the other side.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
so you're looking to do the fidoweb type connectivity thing
Again NO!!! I have gone out of my way to avoid web apps as far as
growing my own has been concerned. The only Fidonet web interface I
have ever used is at Prism, and only because the telnet interface is totally chock full of DOS-think - yes I said it!!! - and like typical telnet interfaces is not geared towards the much superior linux
terminal. No real surprise or controversy there. Is there?
I honestly believe that everything you think about me and my motivations
is totally wrong and couldn't be more wrong if you honestly tried
harder. If I had to guess it would be because you are blinded by the obvious hardon you have for DOS-think. :::snicker:::
Het leven is goed,
... Do not cry for me Ik heb vi.
Connectivity by BinkP protocol to many nodes worldwide is called
FidoWeb.
Are you learning Dutch?
Huil niet om mij, ik heb vi
I am not sure I, I do not have vi,
The next time I switch on my Raspberry Pi,
I shall have a look at Raspbian Jessie Linux if it also contains vi.
After that I can get high ;-).
It sure has Nano and leafpad.
First in your origin you wrote you have brain, so must also have
feelings.
Or stop stop working if you donot not give them what they need.
Oil for instance ;-).
I did not know your machine had projects ? ;-)
Its user (MK) may have plenty I suppose.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 509 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 108:29:46 |
Calls: | 8,193 |
Files: | 15,442 |
Messages: | 913,171 |