• Testing

    From Nightfox@DIGDIST to All on Mon Apr 20 21:16:45 2020
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    Also, after I reset my scan pointers for StarNet, I turned off scanning of the other available networks. However, when I did a poll, I got the following errors, which looks like I'm still getting packets for message areas I don't have set up from the hub:

    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2004 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2005 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2006 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2007 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2008 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2009 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2017 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2018 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2023 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2024 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2034 [x2]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2038 [x4]

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From apam@DIGDIST/HAPPYLND to Nightfox on Tue Apr 21 06:01:00 2020
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on
    StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan
    pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a
    message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the
    other areas?

    No, there's not many (if any) messages on star net yet. Interestingly,
    the lotr message didn't turn up on starnet for me but rather in the
    developer net C area. Which I am a bit confused about.

    Andrew

    ---
    * MagickaBBS * HappyLand - telnet://magickabbs.com:2023/
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Wed Apr 22 12:37:00 2020
    On 04-20-20 21:16, Nightfox wrote to All <=-

    @VIA: DIGDIST
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on
    StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is
    the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Also, after I reset my scan pointers for StarNet, I turned off scanning
    of the other available networks. However, when I did a poll, I got the following errors, which looks like I'm still getting packets for
    message areas I don't have set up from the hub:

    Check what conferences are turned on at the server end. You may be pulling conferences from other networks.


    ... Bugs come in through open Windows.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST to Vk3jed on Wed Apr 22 14:09:25 2020
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Wed Apr 22 2020 12:37 pm

    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on
    StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan
    pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a
    message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the
    other areas?

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the internal messagebase codes are different..

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 11:25:00 2020
    On 04-22-20 14:09, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?


    ... Assassination is the extreme form of censorship.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST to Vk3jed on Wed Apr 22 19:49:24 2020
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 2020 11:25 am

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up
    in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might
    be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the
    internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?

    Yes, as far as I know. I downloaded the latest info pack for StarNet and set up the conference numbers with the hub according to the info pack. The conference numbers are only applicable on the hub (the conference numbers on my BBS are irrelevant), and StarNet's conference numbers are in the 8000 range.

    I suppose it may be possible that the hub also carries DeveloperNet and has some duplicate conference numbers, but I have no way to check if that's the case.

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Fri Apr 24 11:08:00 2020
    On 04-22-20 19:49, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    @VIA: DIGDIST
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 2020 11:25 am

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up
    in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might
    be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the
    internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?

    Yes, as far as I know. I downloaded the latest info pack for StarNet
    and set up the conference numbers with the hub according to the info
    pack. The conference numbers are only applicable on the hub (the conference numbers on my BBS are irrelevant), and StarNet's conference numbers are in the 8000 range.

    Yeah it's making sure they match the hub that's critical. I'm the same with DOVE-Net. The conference numbers on VERT (and what I've configured my system to talk to) are in the 2000s range. But on my system, they are in the 3000s. I've used static numbers that are exactly 1000 higher than on VERT, so I could feed them on to BRIDGE.

    I suppose it may be possible that the hub also carries DeveloperNet and has some duplicate conference numbers, but I have no way to check if that's the case.

    Log into the hub using telnet and check what conferences are turned on. :)

    But yeah for some reason, you did end up on DeveloperNet. I can post a message in StarNet and see if you get it. :) I'm on the FTN side there. :)


    ... I strive for perfection, what I get is reality.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST to Vk3jed on Thu Apr 23 19:21:14 2020
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Fri Apr 24 2020 11:08 am

    Log into the hub using telnet and check what conferences are turned on. :)

    I did that the other day.

    But yeah for some reason, you did end up on DeveloperNet. I can post a message in StarNet and see if you get it. :) I'm on the FTN side there. :)

    That might help. I suppose I coudl also log into the hub BBS and post a message there myself and see if I get it in the right place on my BBS.

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Mon Sep 14 19:02:00 2020
    On 04-23-20 19:21, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Log into the hub using telnet and check what conferences are turned on. :)

    I did that the other day.

    OK, just covering all bases. :)

    But yeah for some reason, you did end up on DeveloperNet. I can post a message in StarNet and see if you get it. :) I'm on the FTN side there. :)

    That might help. I suppose I coudl also log into the hub BBS and post
    a message there myself and see if I get it in the right place on my
    BBS.

    That's an option too. :)


    ... Do you, Sysop, take this BBS, to be your wedded spouse??
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Ian Stanley@DIGDIST/TRIBEBBS to Nightfox on Tue Mar 16 17:33:00 2021
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on StarNet.
    I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but
    when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is the Lord of
    the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    This reply is a bit late but I've just connected to DEVNET (same host as starnet) and I had a little poke around in the QWK mail message pointers from the QWK menu on digdist.synchro.net and all bar one of the pointers were pointing back to 1967

    I don't know where the starnet main QWK hub is so it is possible that digdist unsubscribed from the network immediately for all I know.

    Where did you find the INFOPAK for starnet?

    Hal

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK Gate v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Tribe BBS (21:1/177)
  • From Nelgin@nelgin@endofthelinebbs.com.nospam to Nightfox on Tue Mar 16 16:32:35 2021
    Nightfox wrote:
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    Also, after I reset my scan pointers for StarNet, I turned off scanning of the other available networks. However, when I did a poll, I got the following errors, which looks like I'm still getting packets for message areas I don't have set up from the hub:

    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2004 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2005 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2006 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2007 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2008 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2009 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2017 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2018 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2023 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2024 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2034 [x2]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2038 [x4]

    Where did this come from? This is DevNet and I think this is over a year old.
  • From Nelgin@nelgin@endofthelinebbs.com.nospam to Nightfox on Tue Mar 16 16:33:06 2021
    and ignore me...stupid tin isn't the best at threading properly.
  • From Dreamer@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Tue Jul 8 01:16:00 2014
    Just a really simple test message.


    ---
    Synchronet Sovereign State BBS
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to DREAMER on Tue Jul 8 08:38:00 2014

    @VIA: SETXBBS
    @MSGID: <53BB8CAE.803.dove-sys@setxchat.net>
    Just a really simple test message.


    ---
    Synchronet Sovereign State BBS


    Looks like it made it here :)



    ...I think, therefore I am. I think.
    ---BapStats Module (bsDBASE v6.1 Build 1)
    wcQWK 6.4 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From Ruben Figueroa@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Fri Sep 26 14:24:00 2014
    New Mystic setup. Wanted to test QWK sending and receiving.
    Already receiving.

    Ruben Figueroa, Owner
    RDFIG Computer Solutions
    Sysop of Prison Board BBS
    http://rdfig.net telnet://rdfig.net

    --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A52 (Windows)
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS*Mesquite Tx*rdfig.net
  • From Fireball@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Ruben Figueroa on Sat Sep 27 23:29:00 2014
    New Mystic setup. Wanted to test QWK sending and receiving.
    Already receiving.

    Ruben Figueroa, Owner
    RDFIG Computer Solutions
    Sysop of Prison Board BBS
    http://rdfig.net telnet://rdfig.net


    Seems to be working just fine. :)

    -=Fireball=-

    ---
    Synchronet Fireball Express!!! BBS - http://fireballex.com telnet://fireballex.com
  • From thumper@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Thu Oct 23 10:12:00 2014
    Got my Linux setup going and checking to see if my QWK mail is getting out. I do see incoming....


    -=Thumper=-
    --SysOp--
    The Wastelands BBS

    ---
    Synchronet -=The Wastelands BBS=- -=wastelands-bbs.bet=-
  • From Knight@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to thumper on Thu Oct 23 13:17:00 2014
    Re: Testing
    By: thumper to All on Thu Oct 23 2014 10:12 am

    Got my Linux setup going and checking to see if my QWK mail is getting out. I do see incoming....

    Received!

    Knight

    ---
    Synchronet The Phunc BBS -- Back from the dead! -- telnet to bbs.phunc.com
  • From thumper@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Knight on Fri Oct 24 15:07:00 2014
    Re: Testing
    By: thumper to All on Thu Oct 23 2014 10:12 am

    Got my Linux setup going and checking to see if my QWK mail is getting out. I do see incoming....

    Received!

    Knight


    Cool!!

    -=Thumper=-
    --SysOp--
    The Wastelands BBS

    ---
    Synchronet -=The Wastelands BBS=- -=wastelands-bbs.bet=-
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to THUMPER on Sun Oct 26 07:41:00 2014
    Got my Linux setup going and checking to see if my QWK mail is getting out.
    do see incoming....

    Looks like it made it all the way here :)

    ...  Lifting Shadows Off a Dream 
    --- Wildcat! v7.0.454.4 (Nov 28 2012), Editor Mod v1.7
    wcQWK 7.0 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From Lord Dead@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ROBERT WOLFE on Mon Oct 27 13:46:00 2014
    I'm going to repy to your test to see if my system is working also




    Got my Linux setup going and checking to see if my QWK mail is getting
    out. do see incoming....

    Looks like it made it all the way here :)

    ...  Lifting Shadows Off a Dream 
    --- Wildcat! v7.0.454.4 (Nov 28 2012), Editor Mod v1.7
    wcQWK 7.0 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us

    ---
    Synchronet TUNDRA - Game On !
  • From Nic2001@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Tue Jan 27 18:37:00 2015
    Hi,

    I`m testing my new BBS DOVE-Net Capability!
    Telnet in on: thebbsuk.ddns.net

    Bye,
    Nick

    ---
    Synchronet THE-BBS - thebbsuk.ddns.net
  • From DesotoFireflite@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Nic2001 on Thu Jan 29 07:16:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: Nic2001 to All on Tue Jan 27 2015 07:37 pm

    I`m testing my new BBS DOVE-Net Capability!
    Telnet in on: thebbsuk.ddns.net


    Looks Good Here

    - FART(n): An audio test of one's waste-disposal system.

    - C.G. Learn
    - Valhalla Home Services! - Telnet://valhalla.synchro.net
    - A Gamers Paradise - Over 100 Registered Online Game Doors!

    ---
    Synchronet Valhalla Home Services USA http://valhalla.synchro.net
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to NIC2001 on Thu Jan 29 11:44:00 2015
    I`m testing my new BBS DOVE-Net Capability!
    Telnet in on: thebbsuk.ddns.net

    Would be nice if we could actually connect to your BBS :)

    ... O_O O_O (_) --Mickey & Minnie meet Satan.
    --- Wildcat! v6.4.454.2 (Nov 17 2011), Editor Mod v1.7
    wcQWK 6.4 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From andrew@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Thu Feb 26 02:37:00 2015
    Hi All

    Just testing my new BBS mail system is working with Dove net.

    My BBS isn't available to the public yet, I'm still working on it.

    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.

    Thanks,
    Andrew


    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)
  • From Mickey@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to andrew on Thu Mar 26 07:45:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: andrew to All on Thu Feb 26 2015 03:37 am

    Hi All

    Just testing my new BBS mail system is working with Dove net.

    My BBS isn't available to the public yet, I'm still working on it.

    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.

    Thanks,
    Andrew


    Not mangled. Good luck with the setup.

    Mickey
    SynchroNET 3.15
    Oxford Mills Remote @ telnet://manningfire.dyndns.org:23
    Living the Past - Living the Dream - Keeping the Blues Alive




    ---
    Synchronet Oxford Mills Remote - manningfire.dyndns.org
  • From Khelair@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to andrew on Thu Mar 26 05:38:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: andrew to All on Thu Feb 26 2015 03:37:00

    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.

    Pong to your ping confirmed.

    ---
    Borg Burgers: We do it our way; your way is irrelevant.
    Synchronet Tinfoil Tetrahedron BBS telnet://tinfoil.synchro.net
  • From Tempo Rubato@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to andrew on Thu Mar 26 09:44:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: andrew to All on Thu Feb 26 2015 03:37 am


    Just testing my new BBS mail system is working with Dove net.

    My BBS isn't available to the public yet, I'm still working on it.

    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.

    Looks fine over here.

    ---
    Synchronet << Crystal Aerie >> Va, USA Telnet://crystal-aerie.com
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ANDREW on Thu Mar 26 12:31:00 2015
    Hi All

    Just testing my new BBS mail system is working with Dove net.

    My BBS isn't available to the public yet, I'm still working on it.

    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.

    Thanks,
    Andrew


    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    ... A paid up computer is, by definition, obsolete.
    --- Wildcat! v6.4.454.2 (Nov 17 2011), Editor Mod v1.7
    wcQWK 6.4 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From John Guillory@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Tempo Rubato on Thu Mar 26 23:05:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: Tempo Rubato to andrew on Thu Mar 26 2015 09:44 am

    Re: Testing
    By: andrew to All on Thu Feb 26 2015 03:37 am
    Just testing my new BBS mail system is working with Dove net.
    My BBS isn't available to the public yet, I'm still working on it.
    Let me know if this arrives and isn't all mangled.
    Not here, as you can see, it's got all these >'s in front of everything he wrote....

    ---
    Synchronet KF5QEO's Shack - kingcoder.net
  • From andrew@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ROBERT WOLFE on Fri Feb 27 00:17:00 2015
    Quoting ROBERT WOLFE:
    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    Yeah :)



    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)
  • From mark firestone@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ANDREW on Fri Mar 27 10:21:00 2015
    --- ANDREW wrote --
    Quoting ROBERT WOLFE:
    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    Yeah :


    Excellent! Same here!


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223
  • From andrew@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to mark firestone on Sat Feb 28 09:20:00 2015
    Quoting mark firestone:
    --- ANDREW wrote --
    Quoting ROBERT WOLFE:
    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    Yeah :


    Excellent! Same here!


    I had a look at your board and tried to write a message but when I went to save it happened to use the same Ctrl key that closes syncterm. Naturally I discovered this afterwards :)

    It looks really good, I always like seeing variety.

    Andrew

    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (telnet://quinn.servebbs.org:2323)
  • From mark firestone@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ANDREW on Sat Mar 28 14:34:00 2015
    --- ANDREW wrote --
    Quoting mark firestone

    I had a look at your board and tried to write a message but when I went to
    it happened to use the same Ctrl key that closes syncterm. Naturally I discovered this afterwards :

    It looks really good, I always like seeing variety.

    Cool. Syncterm uses ctrl-x to exit?

    I'm using nano as an editor, because I've never managed to quite make the full screen editor I wrote work. I'll download a copy of syncterm and check it out.

    Thanks for the kind words!



    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ANDREW on Sat Mar 28 09:57:00 2015
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    Yeah :)

    Some details, please :) Features, availability for download, etc? )



    ...hAS ANYONE SEEN MY cAPSLOCK KEY?
    ---BapStats Module (bsDBASE v6.1 Build 1)
    wcQWK 6.4 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From andrew@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to mark firestone on Sat Feb 28 23:24:00 2015
    Quoting mark firestone:
    --- ANDREW wrote --
    Quoting mark firestone

    I had a look at your board and tried to write a message but when I went to it happened to use the same Ctrl key that closes syncterm. Naturally I discovered this afterwards :

    It looks really good, I always like seeing variety.

    Cool. Syncterm uses ctrl-x to exit?

    It could be a mac os x thing.

    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (telnet://quinn.servebbs.org:2323)
  • From andrew@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ROBERT WOLFE on Sat Feb 28 23:38:00 2015
    Quoting ROBERT WOLFE:
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (no address yet)

    Your own BBS package? :)

    Yeah :)

    Some details, please :) Features, availability for download, etc? )


    Not available for download at the moment, I'd have to fix a few things I hard coded for my BBS.

    Features.. umm still working on those ;)

    - Message Areas (Obviously)
    - File Areas
    - Full screen editor (Still a bit buggy)
    - Multinode chat via XMPP
    - Everything stored in MySQL
    - Written in Java

    There's a few reasons you wouldn't want to run my bbs

    - No support for DOS doors (this is tricky because Java doesn't expose the
    underlying socket descriptor. I tried using reflection to get it, but just
    haven't managed to get dosbox to work with it.
    - Everything stored in MySQL, currently nothing talks to MySQL message areas
    means no FIDO tosser (QWK works with a hacked version of YAQN tosser)
    - Still missing some basic features like user preferences.

    I running it for fun, if people want BRE, FE etc they can log in to one of the other many BBS and play it, or if they want fido messages.

    Andrew

    ---
    + Quinn + Quinn HQ - (telnet://quinn.servebbs.org:2323)
  • From mark firestone@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to ANDREW on Sun Mar 29 12:43:00 2015
    --- ANDREW wrote --
    It could be a mac os x thing

    I thought Mac OS tended to use the Mac OS equavelent of ALT? The command key.

    If this is so, I think it should be reported as a bug. I don't have a working Mac anymore...


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223
  • From Lord Blackfair@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Wed May 27 20:34:00 2015
    I am receiving new messages. Am I sending. I am back online again I lost my other server computer had a system melt down. I just got another doaner computer not as good as the other one but at least it's still a computer.

    ---
    Synchronet Blackfair's Manor - blackfair.synchro.net
  • From Al@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Lord Blackfair on Thu May 28 08:05:00 2015
    On 05/27/15, Lord Blackfair said the following...

    I am receiving new messages. Am I sending. I am back online again I lost my other server computer had a system melt down. I just got another
    doaner computer not as good as the other one but at least it's still a computer.

    As long as it works.. and it seems too.. :)

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- Mystic BBS v1.10 (Linux)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, B.C. Canada
  • From Android8675@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Lord Blackfair on Thu May 28 08:32:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: Lord Blackfair to All on Wed May 27 2015 08:34 pm

    I am receiving new messages. Am I sending. I am back online again I lost my other server computer had a system melt down. I just got another doaner computer not as good as the other one but at least it's still a computer.

    Got ya here...

    To All
    Subject Testing
    Sender Lord Blackfair
    SenderNetAddr BLACKF
    SenderNetAddr BLACKF
    SenderNetType
    Message-ID <55666288.5000.dove-sys@blackf.synchro.net>
    OtherHeader WhenImported: 20150527232808-0700 c1e0
    OtherHeader WhenExported: 20150527234351-0700 c1e0
    OtherHeader ExportedFrom: VERT dove-sys 13905
    SenderNetAddr VERT/BLACKF
    SenderNetType 04 00
    when_written 55668CA8 C12C Wed May 27 2015 08:34 pm EDT
    when_imported 5566B9AD C1E0 Wed May 27 2015 11:46 pm PDT
    type 0000h
    version 0121h
    attr 0000h
    auxattr 00000000h
    netattr 00000000h
    number 6048
    header offset 0D9A20h
    header length 343
    thread_id 6048
    data offset 18A000h
    data field[0] TEXT_BODY, offset 0, length 231
    data field[1] TEXT_TAIL, offset 231, length 68

    ---
    Synchronet Shodan's Core @ ShodansCore.com (Port 2323 for Nethack)
  • From Poindexter Fortran@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Lord Blackfair on Thu May 28 06:27:00 2015
    Re: Testing
    By: Lord Blackfair to All on Wed May 27 2015 08:34 pm

    I am receiving new messages. Am I sending. I am back online again I lost my other server computer had a system melt down. I just got another doaner computer not as good as the other one but at least it's still a computer.

    I received this message just fine.

    ---
    Synchronet realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From tbirdsradio@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Mon Jul 13 13:55:00 2015
    Testing 1,2,3. Is this thing on ?

    ---
    Synchronet TBIRDS BBS telnet://tbirds.dyndns.org
  • From Jon Justvig@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to tbirdsradio on Mon Jul 13 14:09:00 2015
    Testing 1,2,3. Is this thing on ?

    ---
    Synchronet TBIRDS BBS telnet://tbirds.dyndns.org

    Got it here!

    Sincerely,
    Jon Justvig
    telnet://vintagebbsing.com:2323

    ---
    Synchronet http://vintagebbsing.com:8080
  • From Al@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to tbirdsradio on Mon Jul 13 14:21:00 2015
    On 07/13/15, tbirdsradio said the following...

    Testing 1,2,3. Is this thing on ?

    ---
    Synchronet TBIRDS BBS telnet://tbirds.dyndns.org

    5 x 5 :)

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- Mystic BBS v1.10 (Linux)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada
  • From Mickey@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Jon Justvig on Mon Jul 13 21:38:00 2015

    Testing 1,2,3. Is this thing on ?

    Synchronet TBIRDS BBS telnet://tbirds.dyndns.org

    Your Mic is ON! :-)

    Cheers,

    -+-
    Mickey
    SynchroNET 3.15
    Oxford Mills Remote > oxfordmi.synchro.net:23
    Live Music Based IRC Chat @ irc:oxford.synchro.net 6667
    === === ===
    FidoNET 1:249/307 * MusicalNET * DoveNET

    ---
    Synchronet Oxford Mills Remote - manning.webhop.net
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to TBIRDSRADIO on Sun Jul 19 02:46:00 2015
    Testing 1,2,3. Is this thing on ?

    Yep.

    ... paranoia: believing this tagline is about you.
    --- Wildcat! v6.4.454.2 (Nov 17 2011), Editor Mod v1.7
    wcQWK 6.4 Omicron Theta BBS * Memphis, TN * winserver.us
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to All on Mon Apr 20 21:16:00 2020
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    Also, after I reset my scan pointers for StarNet, I turned off scanning of the other available networks. However, when I did a poll, I got the following errors, which looks like I'm still getting packets for message areas I don't have set up from the hub:

    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2004 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2005 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2006 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2007 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2008 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2009 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2017 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2018 [x9]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2023 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2024 [x4]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2034 [x2]
    4/20 09:13:11p QNET !Message from STARFRON on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE NUMBER: 2038 [x4]

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Wed Apr 22 12:37:00 2020
    On 04-20-20 21:16, Nightfox wrote to All <=-

    @VIA: DIGDIST
    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on
    StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a message in is
    the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the other areas?

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Also, after I reset my scan pointers for StarNet, I turned off scanning
    of the other available networks. However, when I did a poll, I got the following errors, which looks like I'm still getting packets for
    message areas I don't have set up from the hub:

    Check what conferences are turned on at the server end. You may be pulling conferences from other networks.


    ... Bugs come in through open Windows.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Vk3jed on Wed Apr 22 14:09:00 2020
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Wed Apr 22 2020 12:37 pm

    Hi all - I just want to make sure my BBS is set up correctly on
    StarNet. I just fixed my conference numbers and set my scan
    pointers back, but when I polled the hub, the only area I got a
    message in is the Lord of the Rings area. Are there messages in the
    other areas?

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the internal messagebase codes are different..

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 11:25:00 2020
    On 04-22-20 14:09, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    This appeared in DeveloperNet. :)

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?


    ... Assassination is the extreme form of censorship.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Nightfox@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Vk3jed on Wed Apr 22 19:49:00 2020
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 2020 11:25 am

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up
    in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might
    be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the
    internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?

    Yes, as far as I know. I downloaded the latest info pack for StarNet and set up the conference numbers with the hub according to the info pack. The conference numbers are only applicable on the hub (the conference numbers on my BBS are irrelevant), and StarNet's conference numbers are in the 8000 range.

    I suppose it may be possible that the hub also carries DeveloperNet and has some duplicate conference numbers, but I have no way to check if that's the case.

    Nightfox

    ---
    Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Vk3jed@DIGDIST/BATTLEST/FREEWAY to Nightfox on Fri Apr 24 11:08:00 2020
    On 04-22-20 19:49, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    @VIA: DIGDIST
    Re: Re: Testing
    By: Vk3jed to Nightfox on Thu Apr 23 2020 11:25 am

    Weird, as I posted it on StarNet from my BBS, and that's where my
    message is on my BBS.. I did get one reply on my BBS that came up
    in DeveloperNet Announcements. I'm not sure where the mixup might
    be. I checked my message area configuration on my BBS, and the
    internal messagebase codes are different..

    And the QWK conference numbers are correct for the hub you're posting to?

    Yes, as far as I know. I downloaded the latest info pack for StarNet
    and set up the conference numbers with the hub according to the info
    pack. The conference numbers are only applicable on the hub (the conference numbers on my BBS are irrelevant), and StarNet's conference numbers are in the 8000 range.

    Yeah it's making sure they match the hub that's critical. I'm the same with DOVE-Net. The conference numbers on VERT (and what I've configured my system to talk to) are in the 2000s range. But on my system, they are in the 3000s. I've used static numbers that are exactly 1000 higher than on VERT, so I could feed them on to BRIDGE.

    I suppose it may be possible that the hub also carries DeveloperNet and has some duplicate conference numbers, but I have no way to check if that's the case.

    Log into the hub using telnet and check what conferences are turned on. :)

    But yeah for some reason, you did end up on DeveloperNet. I can post a message in StarNet and see if you get it. :) I'm on the FTN side there. :)


    ... I strive for perfection, what I get is reality.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    Synchronet Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au